Did mandatory helmet law kill Melbourne's bike share scheme?

For all discussions about this "lively" subject. All topics that are substantially about helmet usage will be moved here.
User avatar
Cunobelin
Posts: 10801
Joined: 6 Feb 2007, 7:22pm

Re: Did mandatory helmet law kill Melbourne's bike share scheme?

Post by Cunobelin »

Wanlock Dod wrote:
mjr wrote:Relatedly: has public mass cycle hire worked anywhere with helmet forcing?

Helsinki has a city bike scheme which they seem to think is pretty successful, and I also have a feeling that they have a helmet law. I suspect that the difference with Australia is in how the helmet law is enforced.


The Finnish are also looking at the option of repealing the Helmet Legislation
mattheus
Posts: 5124
Joined: 29 Dec 2008, 12:57pm
Location: Western Europe

Re: Did mandatory helmet law kill Melbourne's bike share scheme?

Post by mattheus »

a PM riding a bike without a helmet is a good thing




(sorry about that - I think it's becoming a reflex ... )
Mike Sales
Posts: 7898
Joined: 7 Mar 2009, 3:31pm

Re: Did mandatory helmet law kill Melbourne's bike share scheme?

Post by Mike Sales »

It is said that the Vancouver hire scheme works, in spite of a helmet law, but

Code: Select all

 I'm from Portland, Oregon, where bicycle helmets are only required for children. I read the laws carefully before coming to Vancouver to attend UBC for a semester, and the law clearly says helmets are mandatory for everyone... yet when I was biking the seawall for the first time, I'd say I was in the minority for people actually wearing helmets.


And

Helmets are compulsory in Vancovuer and the popular bike share systems just lock a helmet to the bike. When you unlock the bike the helmet is freed. Some people put the helmet in the basket and ride without it. I
It's the same the whole world over
It's the poor what gets the blame
It's the rich what gets the pleasure
Isn't it a blooming shame?
Post Reply