You are a very long way from convincing cyclists as a whole and light years away from convincing the general public of that view. The fact that there is a seperate section to discuss this topic suggests you will never achieve that goal. The issue is that you allow a minority opinion adversly affect the interests of cycling and cyclists as a whole even though its not part of the proposal.
I think that the more this topic is raised needlessly in public the more likely there will be legislation.
Then I had better keep at it.
I didnt raise it but if I let the comment in the article go unchallenged, how exactly will I make progress in enlightening people?
I think it has a separate section because people have heard enough of the argument, not because they have decided they do all want compulsory helmet wearing.