pete75 wrote:Whatever Hilleberg use for footprints is cheap. The 80 quid for a Nallo2 footprint is definitely cheap compared to the price of the tent.
It looks to be exactly the same stuff as the groundsheets are made from. Which is rather chunkier than most groundsheets these days, which makes them less necessary than many.
The price of the whole tent is, I think it's safe to assume, significantly influenced by machinist time as well as basic material cost. And there won't be very much machinist time in the case of a flat sheet with a couple of joining seems and a toggle at each corner compared to a whole tent like a Nallo. It's a fair point to say they cost a fortune and far more than you need to pay to get an adequate tent, but if you've got the money and appreciate the details...
mercalia wrote:well at that price you need a footprint for the footprint to stop it getting dirty or damaged
Also fair comment. What I don't understand is the folk who buy the footprint to protect their incredibly expensive tent every time they use it, which is as light and expensive as it is because much money has been thrown at making it robust and light together. If you're going to make a Nallo heavier to preserve your investment then (a) you've missed the boat when it comes to paying more for a lighter tent, and (b)why not get a Nammatj instead?
Pete.
Often seen riding a bike around Dundee...