gaz wrote:Welcome back Paul.
I also never went away.
Thanks gaz

gaz wrote:Welcome back Paul.
I also never went away.
djnotts wrote:Simply that the Notts group has started Saturday "easy" rides and having had my free three tasters and hoping that I can probably just about keep up on most of the c.35 mile outings, I was sufficiently motivated to stump up the over-65s subs!
mjr wrote:djnotts wrote:Simply that the Notts group has started Saturday "easy" rides and having had my free three tasters and hoping that I can probably just about keep up on most of the c.35 mile outings, I was sufficiently motivated to stump up the over-65s subs!
Ah, so the "join else you can't ride on the public roads with us" blackmail policy does work sometimes.
gaz wrote
Are you sure its a certificate
djnotts wrote:"Ah, so the "join else you can't ride on the public roads with us" blackmail policy does work sometimes."
Not how I view it at all. It's a "club" (for want of a better word!) and I can see no element of "blackmail" in a condition that requires me to pay my subs in order to enjoy a benefit of membership. (Pretty much like the EU really....)
meic wrote:I "have" to rejoin. In order to ride with my friends on CTC club rides, to do the FNRTTC, and they are the cover organisation for events like the Cotswold weekend and New Forest Cycling Week.
meic wrote:I am 250 miles from London and all local BC events have compulsory helmet rules.
So it remains a reason why I have to re-join CUK.
nez dans le guidon wrote:I just gave up. I'm 'retired' but 7 months short of state pension and when the renewal came through at £43 I'm afraid it made me think it would be very charitable indeed of me to cough that up on the basis I agreed with the aims of the one time club.