Bonefishblues wrote:There's an opening at the RSPCA, I note, mischievously
I am interested, what is the salary?
Bonefishblues wrote:There's an opening at the RSPCA, I note, mischievously
Cyril Haearn wrote:Bonefishblues wrote:There's an opening at the RSPCA, I note, mischievously
I am interested, what is the salary?
Psamathe wrote:JohnW wrote:Psamathe wrote:Trouble is, that makes it acceptable for PT to publish personal attacks online but can't take criticism (online) back. I think he set the "standard" with his personal attacks.
To be honest it's totally inappropriate for CTC CEO to launch into online personal attacks on others, the sort of thing that should have resulted in disciplinary proceedings (if the CTC was any sort of responsible employer).
Ian
Oh absolutely Ian - two wrongs don't make a right - and an ethical executive/management/trustee board could come down on a CEO who did publicly launch personal attacks, with dismissal being an option. However name-calling and personal attacks began long before this thread. We don't what's been said to who and by whom behind closed doors over the last few years and in these situations. Maybe a CEO isn't the villain of the piece - or at least not the sole villain......
He could have apologised about his attack - but he chose not to so one must assume he feels such behaviour quite acceptable. And if he does not consider it wrong, why should I and it is not a case of two wrongs making a right.
Ian
SA_SA_SA wrote:Is there some reason why the moderators haven't separated out my simple query and the few simple responses (which amounted to 'date not known') from the rest of the discussion drift about PT, as I requested?
Psamathe wrote:SA_SA_SA wrote:Is there some reason why the moderators haven't separated out my simple query and the few simple responses (which amounted to 'date not known') from the rest of the discussion drift about PT, as I requested?
I think your question was answered - nobody knows. So separating it out would mean removing your initial question to a thread of its own!.
Threads always drift, it's the nature of conversations. Also I don't regard threads as "owned" by the original poster. Just as in any conversation you can ask a question but if nobody answers and starts discussing related aspects do you start demanding people answer your question or go elsewhere ?
Ian
SA_SA_SA wrote:Is there some reason why the moderators haven't separated out my simple query and the few simple responses (which amounted to 'date not known') from the rest of the discussion drift about PT, as I requested?
Cyril Haearn wrote:He is still there there nearly 2.5 years later
mjr wrote:Cyril Haearn wrote:He is still there there nearly 2.5 years later
And what's the latest membership figure?
PH wrote:mjr wrote:Cyril Haearn wrote:He is still there there nearly 2.5 years later
And what's the latest membership figure?
68,000 according to the latest email. I know it's fluctuated within my area, but never by more than a few percent and it's been steadily rising for at least five years. We used to get the contact details, but now just the numbers and a way of contacting them blind which complies with GDPR. There was never the mass exudes that some predicted, or even advocated.
Tinpotflowers wrote:It would be interesting to know membership figures in other areas, and does it compare with British Cycling and if cycling in the general population has gone up?
PH wrote:mjr wrote:Cyril Haearn wrote:He is still there there nearly 2.5 years later
And what's the latest membership figure?
68,000 according to the latest email. I know it's fluctuated within my area, but never by more than a few percent and it's been steadily rising for at least five years. We used to get the contact details, but now just the numbers and a way of contacting them blind which complies with GDPR. There was never the mass exudes that some predicted, or even advocated.
Tinpotflowers wrote:... and if cycling in the general population has gone up?