pre STI shifters for racing

Now we have something / quite-a-lot to discuss and celebrate.
User avatar
Si
Moderator
Posts: 14468
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 7:37pm

pre STI shifters for racing

Postby Si » 10 Nov 2017, 3:03pm

Here's a thing...in the days before STI shifters why did pro racers prefer DT shifters to bar end shifters? You'd have thunk that bar end would be better as it would mean less time with hands off the bars and thus quicker shifts..?

rjb
Posts: 2349
Joined: 11 Jan 2007, 10:25am
Location: Somerset (originally 60/70's Plymouth)

Re: pre STI shifters for racing

Postby rjb » 10 Nov 2017, 4:59pm

Many pro riders were using them in the 1960's.
Google the likes of Tom Simpson. The outer cables back then were the standard coiled variety with no super slippery lining and most riders had them under the handlebar tape all the way from the end of the drops to the top of the bars adjacent the stem. The increased friction caused some problems which were overcome by having stronger springs in the rear mech, which in turn meant that the lever had to be a lot tighter than the more modern d/t light action shifters. I tried them back then, the Campag ones but always reverted to D/T levers.

User avatar
Si
Moderator
Posts: 14468
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 7:37pm

Re: pre STI shifters for racing

Postby Si » 12 Nov 2017, 2:11pm

Akes sense. I am converting one of mine back to drops with the choice of dt or be....which got me musing as to why most of the non-sti racers id seen had dt rather than be.

drossall
Posts: 3917
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 10:01pm
Location: North Hertfordshire

Re: pre STI shifters for racing

Postby drossall » 12 Nov 2017, 7:31pm

Bar-end shifters were popular with cross riders, because you didn't have to take your hands off the bars. However, as rjb says, the gears did not respond as crisply, because of the longer cables. Also, there was great emphasis on weight, especially in time trialling, and longer cables are more weight.

The other thing is that down-tube shifters are nowhere near as much a disadvantage as you might think. Since, with a little practice, you know exactly where the lever is without looking, and exactly how much to move it to get the next gear, you can get a really quick change. This is not to deny the benefits of STIs/Ergos, but rather to say that those who have grown up on the modern equipment will probably overestimate how much difference it makes.

User avatar
Si
Moderator
Posts: 14468
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 7:37pm

Re: pre STI shifters for racing

Postby Si » 13 Nov 2017, 7:11am

Yep, i grew up with dt and am familiar with how easy they are to use for touring and day to day riding. But can see why bar based shifters can be preferable for racing and off roading. Still not sure what to use for the 'gravel bike'.

pete75
Posts: 8315
Joined: 24 Jul 2007, 2:37pm

Re: pre STI shifters for racing

Postby pete75 » 14 Nov 2017, 10:15am

Si wrote:Here's a thing...in the days before STI shifters why did pro racers prefer DT shifters to bar end shifters? You'd have thunk that bar end would be better as it would mean less time with hands off the bars and thus quicker shifts..?


In the sixties/seventies when I raced it was not uncommon for the more competitive to accidently nudge an opponents barcon in a close sprint
thus putting them in the wrong gear or derailing the chain altogether. The latter generally led to uncomfortable contact with the crossbar. A lot of us avoided them because of that. They were also a lot more expensive than downtube levers and there wasn't so much money about back then.

drossall
Posts: 3917
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 10:01pm
Location: North Hertfordshire

Re: pre STI shifters for racing

Postby drossall » 14 Nov 2017, 6:59pm

Friends of mine, in social riding, used to lean across on steep hills, and nudge each others' DT shifters into top :D They never did it to me, because I was already way behind in spite of still being on low gears :lol:

Pneumant
Posts: 115
Joined: 7 Oct 2010, 8:25pm

Re: pre STI shifters for racing

Postby Pneumant » 18 Nov 2017, 5:29pm

There is no disadvantage to using DT shifters at all. I much prefer DT levers as they have a snappy and positive feel compared to STI levers. Reaching down to change gear is really no bother at all. In fact if you are on the drops it is a superior set-up as no reaching forward to change gear. DT levers also encourage you to commit to the gear, especially riding uphill, as you do have to be sat down to change gear. This is not quite the hindrance you might imagine as riders of fixed wheel bikes will confirm. So less gear changing but that also equates to less lever / derailleur wear and so on. Other benefits include a very neat appearance, levers unlikely to be damaged in a crash, a lighter bar set-up with less cable and IMO more comfortable brake levers. As mentioned you can also easily see which gear you are in plus you can operate both levers together with either hand. Just try attempting that with STI's!

thirdcrank
Posts: 24463
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: pre STI shifters for racing

Postby thirdcrank » 18 Nov 2017, 5:48pm

I think it may also have something to do with servicing. The more modern Shimano type of bar end lever fits onto its mount not unlike a d/t lever. The original Campag set up had a slot into which the lever fitted, along with a couple of springy washers each with a central slot. What I can only describe as a very deep nut - a sort of threaded tube went through the middle of all that and was tightened up with a bolt. Replacing a cable meant that the whole lot had to be dismantled then put back together. A bit of a faff for a mechanic servicing all a team's bikes in a stage race. I'd agree with the comments about cable drag: I reduced that a bit on mine by running the cable direct from the lever to the d/t stop.
==================================================
Since posting, I've found this with some detailed pics and some explanation

http://www.classiclightweights.co.uk/ca ... -ends.html

User avatar
Si
Moderator
Posts: 14468
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 7:37pm

Re: pre STI shifters for racing

Postby Si » 19 Nov 2017, 12:29pm

There is no disadvantage to using DT shifters


for most day to day riding or touring no, but for racing and off roading sti type shifters do offer an advantage......assuming they are set up right.

pete75
Posts: 8315
Joined: 24 Jul 2007, 2:37pm

Re: pre STI shifters for racing

Postby pete75 » 19 Nov 2017, 4:18pm

Si wrote:
There is no disadvantage to using DT shifters


for most day to day riding or touring no, but for racing and off roading sti type shifters do offer an advantage......assuming they are set up right.


Do STI type shifters offer any real advantage over Campag Ergos or Sram double tap?

User avatar
Si
Moderator
Posts: 14468
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 7:37pm

Re: pre STI shifters for racing

Postby Si » 19 Nov 2017, 8:16pm

pete75 wrote:
Si wrote:
There is no disadvantage to using DT shifters


for most day to day riding or touring no, but for racing and off roading sti type shifters do offer an advantage......assuming they are set up right.


Do STI type shifters offer any real advantage over Campag Ergos or Sram double tap?


dunno, i was using the phrase ' sti type' to mean the integrated brake/gear lever from any maker.

pete75
Posts: 8315
Joined: 24 Jul 2007, 2:37pm

Re: pre STI shifters for racing

Postby pete75 » 19 Nov 2017, 8:21pm

Si wrote:
pete75 wrote:
Si wrote:
for most day to day riding or touring no, but for racing and off roading sti type shifters do offer an advantage......assuming they are set up right.


Do STI type shifters offer any real advantage over Campag Ergos or Sram double tap?


dunno, i was using the phrase ' sti type' to mean the integrated brake/gear lever from any maker.


OOOOh be careful the Big S will be onto you for trademark violation :wink: