UCI embarrasses itself with affiliation to virtual cycling nonsense

Now we have something / quite-a-lot to discuss and celebrate.
Post Reply
thelawnet
Posts: 2736
Joined: 27 Aug 2010, 12:56am

UCI embarrasses itself with affiliation to virtual cycling nonsense

Post by thelawnet »

Zwift is a virtual cycling game. Basically the cycling equivalent of indoor rowing.

Except that with indoor rowing you just buy a rowing machine for £1000 and you're done. If you're stronger than the other competitors you'll win.

Zwift has nonsense involving 'unlocks' in the manner of modern computer games, where you have to jump through certain hoops and you'll get better virtual equipment relative to everyone else.

In addition, you can make yourself much faster in the game by simply lying about your weight, so that the game thinks you are, say, 50kg, when you are actually 100kg.

It's a good training tool but as a UCI championship it's a joke.

Anyway, they've just disqualified their first champion because he unlocked a faster bike using an automated tool. The approved method was to climb 50,000 metres in the game, which isn't all that far, but presumably he was already a strong cyclist and didn't want to spend 100 hours cycling up a fake hill so just used a bot instead.

He's now banned from proper cycling racing, not just electronic nonsense, for six months, for this heinous crime.

https://www.bikeradar.com/news/cameron- ... qualified/
Brucey
Posts: 44690
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: UCI embarrasses itself with affiliation to virtual cycling nonsense

Post by Brucey »

there's also the issue of 'calibration' of your resistance. I'd be amazed if folk are not messing about with this, and how it is (or ever could be) scrutinised for 'official' purposes is a mystery to me. One of my chums had his home trainer go 'phut' and the replacement (from the same manufacturer) is, he thinks, different. At least that is what the changed relationship between pulse rate and power output suggest.

Virtual cycling?

-Virtual nonsense, more like.

Best regarded as 'a bit of fun' and an antidote to training in foul weather, I'd say.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
thelawnet
Posts: 2736
Joined: 27 Aug 2010, 12:56am

Re: UCI embarrasses itself with affiliation to virtual cycling nonsense

Post by thelawnet »

It looks like qualification was done remotely, so people could cheat to qualify in the first place, but then the top 10 went into a studio so cheating wasn't possible then, except that they decided to have this virtual equipment nonsense rather than just giving everyone the same virtual bike.
landsurfer
Posts: 5327
Joined: 27 Oct 2012, 9:13pm

Re: UCI embarrasses itself with affiliation to virtual cycling nonsense

Post by landsurfer »

Cycling involves going out in the foul weather .... and the nice weather ..... as i am about to do ... foul weather today .. :(
“Quiet, calm deliberation disentangles every knot.”
Be more Mike.
The road goes on forever.
User avatar
mjr
Posts: 20337
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: UCI embarrasses itself with affiliation to virtual cycling nonsense

Post by mjr »

How does this embarrass UCI? Does anyone not yet know they'll work for anyone willing to pay enough? Even Epogen's maker is allowed to buy a race - if only they'd paid up before their product was banned.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
User avatar
foxyrider
Posts: 6060
Joined: 29 Aug 2011, 10:25am
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire

Re: UCI embarrasses itself with affiliation to virtual cycling nonsense

Post by foxyrider »

mjr wrote:How does this embarrass UCI?


more to the point - it wasn't the UCI but British Cycling! Please folks, check your details. Yes the UCI are talking about running a championship but this case wasn't it.
Last edited by foxyrider on 6 Oct 2019, 5:14pm, edited 1 time in total.
Convention? what's that then?
Airnimal Chameleon touring, Orbit Pro hack, Orbit Photon audax, Focus Mares AX tour, Peugeot Carbon sportive, Owen Blower vintage race - all running Tulio's finest!
User avatar
mjr
Posts: 20337
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: UCI embarrasses itself with affiliation to virtual cycling nonsense

Post by mjr »

British Cycling are just a local branch of UCI. Very similar, except BC probably worse because they've bigger efforts in taking over and marginalising non sport cycling.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
User avatar
foxyrider
Posts: 6060
Joined: 29 Aug 2011, 10:25am
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire

Re: UCI embarrasses itself with affiliation to virtual cycling nonsense

Post by foxyrider »

mjr wrote:British Cycling are just a local branch of UCI. Very similar, except BC probably worse because they've bigger efforts in taking over and marginalising non sport cycling.


They are not a 'local branch' of the UCI, they are the UK's recognised international body who are affiliated to the UCI. They can and do set the rules for UK competition under their auspices which may or may not be similar to the UCI which is the self declared international governing body. In short, if you want to race internationally you have to comply with UCI rules but if you only compete in the UK its BC's rules you need to worry about. For better or worse, its the UCI that is recognised as the global cycling body so if we want to see cycling at, for example, the Olympics its them we have to kow tow to.
Convention? what's that then?
Airnimal Chameleon touring, Orbit Pro hack, Orbit Photon audax, Focus Mares AX tour, Peugeot Carbon sportive, Owen Blower vintage race - all running Tulio's finest!
100%JR
Posts: 1138
Joined: 31 May 2016, 10:47pm
Location: High Green,Sheffield.

Re: UCI embarrasses itself with affiliation to virtual cycling nonsense

Post by 100%JR »

I got bored of Zwift quite quickly.It just wasn't for me.I know people who no longer ride their bikes anywhere but in their "Zwift room" whatever the weather they Zwift.Some take it very seriously :|
Some folk are strange :lol:
mattheus
Posts: 5130
Joined: 29 Dec 2008, 12:57pm
Location: Western Europe

Re: UCI embarrasses itself with affiliation to virtual cycling nonsense

Post by mattheus »

I agree with thelawnet - the UCI (and/or BC) look like fudging idiots here. As if Sock-length Gate wasn't laughable enough, at least that was about real performance issues!

This is a farce.

(I've nothing against peeps who enjoy Zwift, BTW.)
Polisman
Posts: 660
Joined: 9 May 2019, 2:23pm

Re: UCI embarrasses itself with affiliation to virtual cycling nonsense

Post by Polisman »

It seems the UCI have too much time their hands and not enough 'issues' to spend it on! I wish I had their problems :shock:
Post Reply