Philip Benstead wrote:what point are you trying to make,?
Obvious swerve is obvious!
however its a pretty critical point that we are getting down to really Philip - you have been most vociferous in saying that other
councillors are not doing their job properly and accused them gf being "worn down by pt cabal", that "some on council do not understand the concept of democracy" and suggesting undue influence.
You have attacked others as not doing their job and not representing the 'membership' properly.
Most damningly, you have said that: "You must remember the minutes of council do not give the true feeling of the councillor's". Well - it was YOUR flipping job to make sure that this did not happen wasn't it!
Why should any of us accept anything you have to say now if you failed to do anything about it or object while you were on council yourself? It stinks of hypocrisy!
So, I am going to ask you very simply and very clearly again:did you approve/assent to the approval of the minutes that you now claim to have not been an accurate representation of the discussions at council or not?
I am sure that anyone else reading this will be able to make their own judgement if you continue to avoid answering this simple and fair question