gaz wrote:There is no possible justification for the reply sent to Velocio by Oliver Foster.
No justification but probably an explanation. I would assume he meant to forward this to someone rather than reply and just hit the wrong button.
gaz wrote:There is no possible justification for the reply sent to Velocio by Oliver Foster.
geocycle wrote:I think this is quite serious and the case as presented should lead to disciplinary action. Perhaps it is prudent to lock the thread until any process occurs?
Si wrote:er, your quoting of my pm sounds a little like you think it was a negative thing - not so, I was only trying to get some sort of explanation for you from a source more likely to reply than the CEO..
Of course there are two sides to every story, but I can't see any justification for calling someone a 'git'.
Bicycler wrote:Maybe one for gaz ... does the CTC have a formal complaints procedure?
Velocio wrote:...and thanks for intervening with your colleagues on my behalf ...I did not find your message at all negative ...but felt it should be included here ...as it's been the only official response I've received from anybody yet ...thank you everyone who's been as shocked and amazed as I was