Atypical morphology ( I'm not like other men )

drossall
Posts: 6142
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 10:01pm
Location: North Hertfordshire

Re: Atypical morphology ( I'm not like other men )

Post by drossall »

foxyrider wrote:Back in the mists of time we all rode steel and sizing was often haphazard.

I didn't find it so. There was a pretty good idea on sizing, and most clubs had plenty of knowledgeable members. Of course, convention did change - in the 50s/60s, people rode larger frames with less pin showing and (presumably) shorter stems or maybe even shorter top tubes than the same size frame would typically have had a couple of decades later, when frames were generally smaller for a given rider height. But it didn't mean that bikes didn't fit.
Post Reply