Fully suspended Spa Tourer

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
UpWrong
Posts: 2446
Joined: 31 May 2009, 12:16pm
Location: Portsmouth, Hampshire

Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by UpWrong »

Well, not quite. With Suntour NCX parallelogram seatpost and Suntour hybrid CR-8 suspension fork
Attachments
WP_20170501_15_45_43_ProV2.jpg
Last edited by UpWrong on 3 May 2017, 8:46pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16148
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by 531colin »

Calendar is slow. First of May to-day.
JohnW
Posts: 6667
Joined: 6 Jan 2007, 9:12pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by JohnW »

531colin wrote:Calendar is slow. First of May to-day.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
recordacefromnew
Posts: 334
Joined: 21 Dec 2012, 3:17pm

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by recordacefromnew »

UpWrong wrote:Well, not quite. With Suntour NRX parallelogram seatpost and Suntour hybrid CR-8 suspension fork


I don't know if you have tried riding it, but those forks will change the handling of the bike as designed, quite significantly.

Suntour is not exactly renowned for offering detailed info on their products, but comparing with the original rigid forks, I suspect the CR8 to have an additional A2C of c60mm, and probably c10mm less offset.

Assuming yours is not a 48mm frame, and the geometry of your frame is the same as the current model's at http://www.spacycles.co.uk/smsimg/uploads/touringgeometry.jpg, an additional A2C of 60mm will give you a 3 degree reduction in head tube angle. Combine that with the difference in offset, the original trail of 62mm, which is normal, will become more like 92mm.

Steering will feel a lot more sluggish, amongst other more subtle changes in reaches/CG etc.

Also the CR8 forks, at c2.4kg, are nearly as heavy as the nice, light steel frame you have got, yet has only 40mm/50mm of max travel. Some might consider it preferable to adopt bigger tyres running at lower pressure instead, even if it meant acquiring a pair of suitable rigid forks and/or different mudguards for additional clearance. Bigger tyres might also let one do without a suspension seatpost, which are never light, and don't keep a constant "seat height" (saddle to bb distance).
Brucey
Posts: 44705
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by Brucey »

recordacefromnew wrote: ....Assuming yours is not a 48mm frame....


I think that is a pretty safe bet, isn't it...? :wink:

but joking aside, I agree the steering is likely to be a fair bit different.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
Gattonero
Posts: 3730
Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 1:35pm
Location: London

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by Gattonero »

Also, if that is the saddle height I would advise a completely different bike
It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best,
since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them.
Thus you remember them as they actually are...
UpWrong
Posts: 2446
Joined: 31 May 2009, 12:16pm
Location: Portsmouth, Hampshire

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by UpWrong »

It's the 51cm frame. Saddle is as low as it will go and yes it might still be a bit too high for me. Standover is on the margin too. Fork is taller than I anticipated. Will measure it. I wanted to give it a go. Only paid about £15 for the fork anyway.
whoof
Posts: 2519
Joined: 29 Apr 2014, 2:13pm

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by whoof »

I like your cat tea cosy. I have a couple of owl ones.
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16148
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by 531colin »

By all means "give it a go".....but I don't think I would like the way it will steer.
As "record ace" says, you have increased the trail 2 ways....longer fork for shallower head angle, and less offset.
I think you will get "wheel flop" where the steering turns in sharply because the front of the bike drops as soon as the steering isn't "straight ahead".
With the front of the bike jacked up like that and the handlebars high and close, I don't think you will have enough weight on the front of the bike to get any movement out of the forks, and the bottom bracket is pretty high.
User avatar
Gattonero
Posts: 3730
Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 1:35pm
Location: London

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by Gattonero »

UpWrong wrote:It's the 51cm frame. Saddle is as low as it will go and yes it might still be a bit too high for me. Standover is on the margin too. Fork is taller than I anticipated. Will measure it. I wanted to give it a go. Only paid about £15 for the fork anyway.


Not a lot of money, but those forks aren't right so is not a useful purchase.
That bike was never meant to have the forks so tall, the headtube angle slackened, and the bars so high.

My advice is to look for a bike that will keep you more upright to begin with, so to not need those extreme alterations.
It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best,
since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them.
Thus you remember them as they actually are...
User avatar
Si
Moderator
Posts: 15191
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 7:37pm

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by Si »

I wonder also that should your head tube snap off, the fitting of an overly long fork might invalidate any warrantee that you have left on the frame?

Although getting the wrong length fork isn't always bad - I had an MTB that was corrected for 100mm forks, I put on a standard rigid fork with no correction and the ride on the road was much better when used as a fast, light, nippy cafe racer - lost its MTB neutrality and became much more flickable....of course, part of this may just have been down to the weight moving forward as the bars were lower. But I fear that going in the opposite direction will not be beneficial.
Bmblbzzz
Posts: 6325
Joined: 18 May 2012, 7:56pm
Location: From here to there.

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by Bmblbzzz »

There's a decent tradition of attaching a rack and, where possible, mudguards to a MTB and using it as a tourer. You seem to be going in the opposite direction. And why not? There's also an even longer tradition of riding tourers off road. I'm not sure that what you've made will handle like a mountain bike, but it certainly won't feel like a Spa Tourer.
UpWrong
Posts: 2446
Joined: 31 May 2009, 12:16pm
Location: Portsmouth, Hampshire

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by UpWrong »

Si wrote:I wonder also that should your head tube snap off, the fitting of an overly long fork might invalidate any warrantee that you have left on the frame?


That's a bit pessimistic. I would expect that the suspension would reduce impacts on the frame and lower the risk of damage.
UpWrong
Posts: 2446
Joined: 31 May 2009, 12:16pm
Location: Portsmouth, Hampshire

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by UpWrong »

whoof wrote:I like your cat tea cosy. I have a couple of owl ones.


That tea cosy is one of the best purchases I've made :D .
UpWrong
Posts: 2446
Joined: 31 May 2009, 12:16pm
Location: Portsmouth, Hampshire

Re: Fully suspended Spa Tourer

Post by UpWrong »

Difference in A2C is approx 65 or 70mm. Hmmm, tempted to install the std fork afterall which would lower the seat height a little ensuring that I'm comfortable using the NCX seatpost. OTOH I've played around with trail on 'bents so why not give it a go on an upright? :twisted:
Post Reply