142mm Through Axle Hubs for Touring

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
Post Reply
hamish
Posts: 502
Joined: 5 Mar 2008, 11:29pm

142mm Through Axle Hubs for Touring

Post by hamish »

I was looking at the latest version of the Surly Ogre/Troll. I have an old, Rohloffed, Troll and have been thinking about changing to an Ogre.

Their 'dropouts' take 135mm and 142mm hubs. I suspect they work best with 142mm so... Are there any 142mm through axle hubs that are up to the job for touring?
thelawnet
Posts: 2736
Joined: 27 Aug 2010, 12:56am

Re: 142mm Through Axle Hubs for Touring

Post by thelawnet »

I don't think that's true.

The Surly has a design that takes pretty much any hub standard

https://surlybikes.com/blog/ogre_sauce

However none of them are particularly ideal.

If you are not using a Rohloff, I'd probably go for a Shimano M756 hub, which is 135 X qr9. On the basis that the supposed extra stiffness of the 142 X ta12 isn't going to be realised in that frame.
hamish
Posts: 502
Joined: 5 Mar 2008, 11:29pm

Re: 142mm Through Axle Hubs for Touring

Post by hamish »

Yes.. The new Surly frames with Gnot Boost take both... But to use 135mm you have to use adaptors that are a bit more of a faff and introduce a weakness relative to an normal 135mm dropout without small alloy widgets. Also the 142mm hubs drop out vertically where as the 135 tend to go I from the back... which is more faff.

I agree the rigidity benefits aren't the main thing on a Gnotboost frame- but I think the 142mm through axle will be stronger and simpler than 135mm with adaptors.

The Jury is still out as to whether I'd transfer the Rohloff to an Ogre. I may be suffering fro Rohloff fatigue. I'm not sure.
NickJP
Posts: 808
Joined: 24 Sep 2018, 7:11pm
Location: Canberra, OZ

Re: 142mm Through Axle Hubs for Touring

Post by NickJP »

The last touring bike I put together I used Onyx thru-axle MTB disc hubs. They've been completely problem-free so far, though that's only about 18 months of use so far. They're extremely nicely made, and also extremely expensive - same sort of price range as Phil Wood and Chris King. I mainly used them because the freehub mechanism is completely silent, as it uses a sprag clutch.
rjb
Posts: 7244
Joined: 11 Jan 2007, 10:25am
Location: Somerset (originally 60/70's Plymouth)

Re: 142mm Through Axle Hubs for Touring

Post by rjb »

This could be of interest to tandem owners who have oln dimensions of 145mm. Could you use a 142 through axle with a qr adaptor and possibly a 1 mm washer either side to get the spacing correct ? I'm just thinking outside the box here as I have no idea if it's feasible.
At the last count:- Peugeot 531 pro, Dawes Discovery Tandem, Dawes Kingpin X3, Raleigh 20 stowaway X2, 1965 Moulton deluxe, Falcon K2 MTB dropped bar tourer, Rudge Bi frame folder, Longstaff trike conversion on a Giant XTC 840 :D
Brucey
Posts: 44712
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: 142mm Through Axle Hubs for Touring

Post by Brucey »

the sprag clutches in Onyx hubs give the hub a distinctly spongy feeling in the low gears especially. Not everyone's cup of tea that; hubs with pawls in feel a lot more direct.

The spongy feeling is shared with the gone but not quite forgotten shimano 'silentclutch' hubs. The idea has come around again and there are new slightly different silentclutch 'scylence' freehubs in the offing once more.https://bikerumor.com/2016/01/26/shimano-patent-shows-silent-ring-drive-hub-internals-that-could-be-the-next-dura-ace/ https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/technologies/component/details/new-tech-scylence.htmlGawd knows if they are any good or not; the original ones not only felt spongy, they often broke in hard use too. The new ones remind me of Chris King freehubs; these are very clever but if water gets inside they soon turn themselves into a very expensive piece of scrap metal. Shimano claim no spongy feeling with their new design (which appears to generate axial clamping loads to transmit the drive) but the wearing parts appear to be made of aluminium which does not bode well.

The reason for the spongy feeling is that with many so-called 'silent clutch' designs the drive is transmitted by a wedging action that creates enormous (usually radial) forces in the mechanism. This has several consequences beyond the sponginess; the stresses are so high that the mechanism is at risk of breakage unless it is very heavily built. The heavier build makes the mechanism heavy. Onyx hubs are about the same weight as standard ( ~ £30 a go) shimano freehubs, and original shimano silent clutch hubs were heavier than that.

Shimano will have tested their new design for sure, but probably they will have tested it in California, where it doesn't rain much. I reserve judgement about whether or not this scheme will work in UK conditions....

The daft thing about all this is that it is all a complete waste of time; if you want a silent freehub you can have one; just use SFG in a standard shimano freehub body. This also stops the mechanism from failing due to the weather too; good all round.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
thelawnet
Posts: 2736
Joined: 27 Aug 2010, 12:56am

Re: 142mm Through Axle Hubs for Touring

Post by thelawnet »

Brucey wrote: The spongy feeling is shared with the gone but not quite forgotten shimano 'silentclutch' hubs. The idea has come around again and there are new slightly different silentclutch 'scylence' freehubs in the offing once more.https://bikerumor.com/2016/01/26/shimano-patent-shows-silent-ring-drive-hub-internals-that-could-be-the-next-dura-ace/ https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/technologies/component/details/new-tech-scylence.htmlGawd knows if they are any good or not; the original ones not only felt spongy, they often broke in hard use too. The new ones remind me of Chris King freehubs; these are very clever but if water gets inside they soon turn themselves into a very expensive piece of scrap metal. Shimano claim no spongy feeling with their new design (which appears to generate axial clamping loads to transmit the drive) but the wearing parts appear to be made of aluminium which does not bode well.


These have now been cancelled. Not happening.

https://www.pinkbike.com/news/shimanos- ... lable.html

Patent issues? Rubbish?

who knows.
LittleGreyCat
Posts: 1185
Joined: 7 Aug 2013, 8:31pm

Re: 142mm Through Axle Hubs for Touring

Post by LittleGreyCat »

SFG?
Looked it up and it appears to be Scouting For Girls. :shock:
Or possibly Special Forces Group (Belgium). At least they are usually silent. :lol:

Edit: Could be Seriously Fick Grease?
Brucey
Posts: 44712
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: 142mm Through Axle Hubs for Touring

Post by Brucey »

Semi Fluid Grease

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RRSODL
Posts: 186
Joined: 17 Apr 2012, 7:22am

Re: 142mm Through Axle Hubs for Touring

Post by RRSODL »

hamish wrote:I was looking at the latest version of the Surly Ogre/Troll. I have an old, Rohloffed, Troll and have been thinking about changing to an Ogre.

Their 'dropouts' take 135mm and 142mm hubs. I suspect they work best with 142mm so... Are there any 142mm through axle hubs that are up to the job for touring?


I built a Surly Ogre touring (do it all bike ) 5 months ago. I went for the boost Hope Pro hubs, they are doing OK so far but I think I prefer the Novatec hubs I had before, roll a lot better, hard to find though.
User avatar
Gattonero
Posts: 3730
Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 1:35pm
Location: London

Re: 142mm Through Axle Hubs for Touring

Post by Gattonero »

hamish wrote:... Are there any 142mm through axle hubs that are up to the job for touring?


if you're thinking about strength, they've been developed for MTB's to take 10-20ft drops... :wink:
It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best,
since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them.
Thus you remember them as they actually are...
Post Reply