Page 2 of 3

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 18 Feb 2020, 10:58am
by Audax67
Cyril Haearn wrote:The comic, or Cycling Weakly :wink:

I think this is one case where one should try to do it oneself (not pay an expert), as described by 531Colin
The case described above, where a well-meaning LBS person changed the adjustments, is a bit disturbing


A bit like those Scouts who "cleaned up" the prehistoric wall paintings in the Grotte de Mayrières and erased half of them.

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 18 Feb 2020, 11:40am
by Brucey
Audax67 wrote:
A bit like those Scouts who "cleaned up" the prehistoric wall paintings in the Grotte de Mayrières and erased half of them.


yesterday's graffiti is tomorrow's art....?

cheers

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 18 Feb 2020, 12:19pm
by David9694
I was getting a range of aches and pains a few years ago and had a bike fit at Primera Sports in Bournemouth. Being somewhat critical, these only really look at you and the bike, when if you’re getting problems, there are likely to be wider factors. Being unfit with a weak and tight core was and is my problem. E.g. keeping my knees straight, can I touch my toes.
Anyway, we set my cleats to the innermost (i.e. to spread my feet apart) and he sold me a shorter stem. He optimised my saddle height - interestingly, he regarded the bottom of the pedal stoke as parallel with the seat tube, rather than vertical. I’ve been whacking-up my saddles ever since so the knee is just off being fully extended. The lengthways adjustment is in truth pretty instinctive - sit on the saddle and see where your palms naturally land.
It wasn’t that expensive and I’m glad I did it; I think you should only have a bike fit if you’re clear what you want to get out of it.

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 18 Feb 2020, 12:31pm
by Cyril Haearn
Prices have been described as high and reasonable, no figures yet, anyone care to disclose? Anyone here offered bike fitting?
Thanks

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 18 Feb 2020, 1:52pm
by PaulS
Cyril Haearn wrote:Prices have been described as high and reasonable, no figures yet, anyone care to disclose?


I paid £100 last March for the fitting. Plus cost for any new bits I needed & labour at £40/hour to fit them. Ended up a bit less than £200 total including new bars & stem. I was very happy with that. No prices on the updated website. He used a jig, and transferred my saddle, pedals, bars onto that. Then set up my bike according to the settings on the jig. Felt like a very thorough & professional process. I guess a lot of the value is in the skill of the person doing the job.

https://www.hewittcycles.co.uk/bike-fitting/

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 19 Feb 2020, 6:49am
by bazzo
I have four bikes, seat is set at the same height for all of them, I don’t worry to much about length as I use drop handlebars and move positions anyway. I find one much more comfortable than all the others, can’t really explain it. I recently tried the 109% method, which lowered my seat by about 25mm reverted back quite quickly. Maybe it’s time for a bike fit, it does however seem like someone else’s opinion against mine.

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 19 Feb 2020, 7:11am
by Jamesh
Like many in here I have too many bikes 6+!!!!

I usually tweek the saddle and bars a couple of times during the initial few rides as im adjusting the gears and brakes etc and then I'm happy with them.

I do have one CX bike with a slipping seat post (covered in grease from the tag along) which I have to adjust regularly. But I usually get it right without hassle and it's not my long distance bike either.

However when I swap bikes with my cycling buddy I find his position is awful and cramped! Despite being the same height as me!

5'10" and frame size 22" btw!!!

Cheers James

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 19 Feb 2020, 11:04am
by NATURAL ANKLING
Hi,
Different length legs?

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 21 Nov 2020, 2:27pm
by PaulS
Update on my bike fit from Hewitt. Felt great at the time. But after a year and a lot of miles it was really a mistake. Thinking seems to have moved on a lot, particularly regarding saddle height. Putting my saddle so high seems to have contributed to some painful knee damage. I had a discussion elsewhere on this forum, and my saddle is now 35mm lower than the bike fit, and I am slowly building up strength again. If the experts can get it so far wrong, I find it hard to give a recommendation.

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 21 Nov 2020, 2:40pm
by Jdsk
How was that saddle height set in comparison to some of the commonly recommended positions?

Thanks

Jonathan

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 21 Nov 2020, 3:14pm
by iandusud
PaulS wrote:Update on my bike fit from Hewitt. Felt great at the time. But after a year and a lot of miles it was really a mistake. Thinking seems to have moved on a lot, particularly regarding saddle height. Putting my saddle so high seems to have contributed to some painful knee damage. I had a discussion elsewhere on this forum, and my saddle is now 35mm lower than the bike fit, and I am slowly building up strength again. If the experts can get it so far wrong, I find it hard to give a recommendation.


Without wishing to comment on or criticise Hewitt's bike fit, I think this demonstrates a potential problem with bike fits. My experience is that bike fit is a very dynamic process. The above example with regard to saddle height is a good example. I find that I need a saddle height that is on the high side of what is considered normal otherwise I get knee problems. Others experience the opposite.

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 21 Nov 2020, 3:30pm
by pwa
iandusud wrote:
PaulS wrote:Update on my bike fit from Hewitt. Felt great at the time. But after a year and a lot of miles it was really a mistake. Thinking seems to have moved on a lot, particularly regarding saddle height. Putting my saddle so high seems to have contributed to some painful knee damage. I had a discussion elsewhere on this forum, and my saddle is now 35mm lower than the bike fit, and I am slowly building up strength again. If the experts can get it so far wrong, I find it hard to give a recommendation.


Without wishing to comment on or criticise Hewitt's bike fit, I think this demonstrates a potential problem with bike fits. My experience is that bike fit is a very dynamic process. The above example with regard to saddle height is a good example. I find that I need a saddle height that is on the high side of what is considered normal otherwise I get knee problems. Others experience the opposite.


I think bike fittings are for people who don't have the experience to set their own bike up. Once you've established a position that works and has worked for quite a while, you'd be a fool to let someone else start mucking it about based on some formulae that work for quite a lot of people but not for everyone. If you haven't yet found a position that does not produce aches and pains, fair enough, asking an "expert" to have a shot at it might help.

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 21 Nov 2020, 3:56pm
by peetee
PaulS wrote:Update on my bike fit from Hewitt. Felt great at the time. But after a year and a lot of miles it was really a mistake. Thinking seems to have moved on a lot, particularly regarding saddle height. Putting my saddle so high seems to have contributed to some painful knee damage. I had a discussion elsewhere on this forum, and my saddle is now 35mm lower than the bike fit, and I am slowly building up strength again. If the experts can get it so far wrong, I find it hard to give a recommendation.


How long had you been riding before the bike fit?

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 21 Nov 2020, 4:07pm
by drossall
pwa wrote:I think bike fittings are for people who don't have the experience to set their own bike up.

This makes sense to me. I'm sure there was an article in the Comic a few years back. They went to different bike fitters and got different results, but failed to draw the obvious conclusion (that there may not be a single clear answer).

That's fine if you think you're looking for improvements in comfort and biomechanics, and even more so if you're a novice. However, if you're going in with the idea that there is one perfect answer, you may be disappointed, I suspect. There are principles, and there are different kinds of riding for which different answers may be better. But I think there was a lot of mileage in the old orthodoxy, whereby you joined a club and got advice on position (and lots of other stuff!) from the critical eyes of the experienced riders there. I'm not sure that paid fits will always improve on that free service.

My only direct experience is of being sent to the local coach when I got back pain in my early racing. He made some tweaks, but I think that ultimately a smaller frame, and my body adapting, were also important.

Re: Bike fitting: why? Why not?

Posted: 21 Nov 2020, 5:38pm
by 531colin
PaulS wrote:Update on my bike fit from Hewitt. Felt great at the time. But after a year and a lot of miles it was really a mistake. Thinking seems to have moved on a lot, particularly regarding saddle height. Putting my saddle so high seems to have contributed to some painful knee damage. I had a discussion **** elsewhere on this forum, and my saddle is now 35mm lower than the bike fit, and I am slowly building up strength again. If the experts can get it so far wrong, I find it hard to give a recommendation.


****This is the thread Paul is referring to https://forum.cyclinguk.org/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=133557&start=30
Paul, I've been wondering how you were getting on....how is the knee pain?
I wonder if you are still a "toe dipper" with your saddle dropped 35mm for a couple of months?