andrew_s wrote:The idea is that you never get any grinding paste inside the chain. The outside of the chain should end up virtually dry, with nothing for gritty bits to stick to. You then clean off any grit that has stuck before lubing the chain, so that the oil doesn't carry grit in with it.
How can you possibly keep the grit out of the chain, even if there is next to no oil on the outside of it? It's an open system; can't get much more open for a mechanical system really. Surface water and road crud fly all over the place; grit is gonna get in.
If you just dump a mucky chain in a bath of degreaser and shake, the degreaser takes grit from the outside to the inside, and once it's in, it's virtually impossible to get it out...
Well, from observation I can get most of the grit out of the chain using my method - I can'y say that I get 100% out, but it's near as damn it. I check the chain for grit, on the bike and when cleaning by bending it laterally - gritty feel? - it gets a deep clean. I fail to understand why the chain bath would only take the grit inside the chain and not flush it out. That's what solvent does, having low viscosity, it penetrates deeply, dissolving thick residues (that also contain worn chain as well!)
and allowing them to be carried out with ease.
How does the Mickle Method address this natural build up? If it proposed a way of flushing old oil out I could understand it's merit, but when you can only push new oil in...
Actually cycling the bike would squeeze the oil out of the links, but then that ride might be in torrential rain where the oily chain is exposed to....err, wet grit.