anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16034
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by 531colin »

Phil_Lee wrote:This is exactly the kind of applied mathematics problem I need to keep my 12 YO son interested in maths - nothing he's been getting at school seems to be stretching him at all.
It's tough staying ahead of him - it won't be very long before He's trying to explain stuff to me that I can't understand :D
...............


I just googled "maths club for kids cambridge".............OMG.. :shock:
As I said at the start of this thread, I'm sure mathematicians are born, not made.....but a little nurturing can't hurt?
snibgo
Posts: 4604
Joined: 29 Jun 2010, 4:45am

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by snibgo »

Divide straddle distance by twice the height from ruler to brake block centre (usually about 25mm nowadays, so divide by 50) and you have your MA. In this case 140/50 = 2.8. :)

Yup. However, dividing by twice the height is to consider only one side of the brake. I wouldn't take twice the height, to give me the MA of the entire brake.

Is this equivalent to the circlecaycles (http://www.circleacycles.com/cantilever ... ometry.pdf) maths? Yes, it is. Here comes the proof.

In the circleacycles diagram, extend YA and OP until they meet. Call that point M. Then MP is CJ's "straddle distance".

Consider the triangle MAP. The sine rule gives us:

MP / sin (180-Beta) = PA / sin yoke_angle

But sin(180-Beta) = sin(Beta) so

MP / sin (Beta) = PA / sin yoke_angle

MP = sin (Beta) * PA / sin yoke_angle
MP = sin (Beta) / sin yoke_angle * PA

So the circleacycles expression
MechanicalAdvantage = sin Beta / sin yoke_angle * PA / OD
becomes:
MechanicalAdvantage = MP / OD

QED.
rjb
Posts: 7183
Joined: 11 Jan 2007, 10:25am
Location: Somerset (originally 60/70's Plymouth)

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by rjb »

Phew - got there in the end 8) , must go for a lie down :mrgreen:
At the last count:- Peugeot 531 pro, Dawes Discovery Tandem, Dawes Kingpin X3, Raleigh 20 stowaway, 1965 Moulton deluxe, Falcon K2 MTB dropped bar tourer, Rudge Bi frame folder, Longstaff trike conversion on a Giant XTC 840 :D
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16034
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by 531colin »

rjb wrote:Phew - got there in the end 8) , must go for a lie down :mrgreen:


You mean you can understand that stuff? I'm wondering if I could borrow Phil's 12 year old lad........
Cyclenut
Posts: 314
Joined: 3 Jul 2007, 9:44am

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by Cyclenut »

snibgo wrote:
Divide straddle distance by twice the height from ruler to brake block centre (usually about 25mm nowadays, so divide by 50) and you have your MA. In this case 140/50 = 2.8. :)

Yup. However, dividing by twice the height is to consider only one side of the brake. I wouldn't take twice the height, to give me the MA of the entire brake.

You're right, my mistake: both brake blocks move so the mechanical advantage of the brake is cable tension divided by TWICE the brake block force. :oops:

EDIT (some months later): No, you're wrong! Why did I fall for that? Probably because my results differ from those of Circle Cycles, whom I mistakenly assumed to know what they were doing since they've gone to all the trouble of building a whole web page around it. Go back and read the maths like Brucey did and you'll see that my calculation of forces takes account of both arms of the brake at the outset. Unlike Circle Cycles, apparently!

Thank you Brucey, for having more confidence in me than I have of myself!
Attachments
Measuring straddle distance
Measuring straddle distance
Chris Juden (at home and not asleep)
Brucey
Posts: 44454
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by Brucey »

I think CJ got it right the first time; take the case of flat arms and b = 2h. This yields a caliper MA of 1:1 not 2:1... Think of cable force x distance = brake pad force x distance. If not then energy is not conserved.

The applet in the link gives MA values that are exctly double those of the whole caliper. This doesn't matter for comparing cantis with other cantis but it does when comparing cantis with other brakes like DPs etc. as I have tried to do here;

http://forum.ctc.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=63112

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16034
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by 531colin »

Because this thread is in "too good to lose" I'm adding a link to a later thread in which "Brucey" reviews MA in some detail
http://forum.ctc.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=63112&start=30
9494arnold
Posts: 1208
Joined: 21 Jan 2007, 3:13pm

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by 9494arnold »

Last picture shows a graphic illustration of the "triangle of forces" involved in this. Well done to the poster.
Had to deal with a friends tandem that had the cantilevers set up incorrectly. Plus whoever fitted the cantilever bosses had got one offset on the fork blade (compared to the other) . A post frame build upgrade error sadly.
SRV
Posts: 43
Joined: 3 Jul 2019, 2:21pm

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by SRV »

A late reply to this thread:
To get the best MA the straddle cable should be perpendicular to the line between its point of attachment to the canti and the canti pivot, on each side, WHEN THE BRAKE IS APPLIED. Ideally, the straddle cable length should be constantly shortened as the pads wear.
This method ignores some of the more complicated geometrical implications, but it works for me and is relatively easy to set up.
The limit is when the cable touches the mudguard or tyre (if no mudguard don't forget to rig a catcher in case the brake cable breaks).
If anybody's still interested I hope this helps.
MikeDee
Posts: 745
Joined: 11 Dec 2014, 8:36pm

anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by MikeDee »

The lower the yoke angle, the higher the MA. Sheldon was right. Unfortunately, adjusting a brake that way puts the pads way too close to the rims and gives a crummy feel at the brake lever. I found the ideal is to have the straddle cable at right angles to the brake arms when the brakes are applied (anchor angle in Sheldon's diagram).
Brucey
Posts: 44454
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by Brucey »

right angles between the arm and the cable is a practical approach with many brakes simply because it doesn't challenge the cable mountings on the ends of the brake arms. However it

a) cannot be achieved with some brakes at all and
b) it is fairly meaningless on others (eg most using post-mount brake blocks) because the arms can be adjusted through a range of angles.

So my vote is 'no cigar'.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MikeDee
Posts: 745
Joined: 11 Dec 2014, 8:36pm

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by MikeDee »

Brucey wrote:right angles between the arm and the cable is a practical approach with many brakes simply because it doesn't challenge the cable mountings on the ends of the brake arms. However it

a) cannot be achieved with some brakes at all and
b) it is fairly meaningless on others (eg most using post-mount brake blocks) because the arms can be adjusted through a range of angles.

So my vote is 'no cigar'.

cheers


No on b. Adjust the straddle cable after adjusting the post mount pads.
Brucey
Posts: 44454
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by Brucey »

the point is not that you can't usually set the straddle at 90 degrees (although you can't always) after you have set the arms, more that the brake MA is different depending on the way you have set the arms. So it isn't a 'one size fits all' setup method.

Fundamentally any method used to 'simplify' canti setup will not work some of the time and/or will deprive you of one of the key features (missing with most other brakes BTW), which is that you can adjust the MA.

Every canti brake manufacturer supplies some fairly straightforward instructions which will apply to their particular brakes. Follow them and you should get reasonable performance. However if you understand what is going on you can nearly always make the brake work slightly different to that, in a way that better suits you.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MikeDee
Posts: 745
Joined: 11 Dec 2014, 8:36pm

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by MikeDee »

Brucey wrote:the point is not that you can't usually set the straddle at 90 degrees (although you can't always) after you have set the arms, more that the brake MA is different depending on the way you have set the arms. So it isn't a 'one size fits all' setup method.

Fundamentally any method used to 'simplify' canti setup will not work some of the time and/or will deprive you of one of the key features (missing with most other brakes BTW), which is that you can adjust the MA.

Every canti brake manufacturer supplies some fairly straightforward instructions which will apply to their particular brakes. Follow them and you should get reasonable performance. However if you understand what is going on you can nearly always make the brake work slightly different to that, in a way that better suits you.

cheers


You might want to edit your post because it is not intelligible (at least to me). How about an example?

The only way I can see that you can't make the yoke angle approach 90 degrees is because you are using fenders or the tire is too tall and the brake arms too short. I don't use fenders and have used cantis on mountain and touring bikes back in the day and had no problems setting them up correctly, so I'm not following you.
Brucey
Posts: 44454
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: anybody explain Sheldon's straddle wire MA?

Post by Brucey »

I was commenting on the suggestion that all that is required is to 'set the straddle at 90 degrees to the arms'. For reasons I have already explained this will not give a reproducible setup.

I don't know how to explain what I have already explained any differently.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Post Reply