Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
Brucey
Posts: 44667
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by Brucey »

I found this picture recently;

Image
:shock:

here;

http://www.disraeligears.co.uk/Site/SunTour_XC_derailleur_(3_pulley_system).html

where the comments include; "Fantastic - except for the fact that it looked so weird that, as you cycled by, dogs barked, babies cried and your friends laughed. At you, not with you. "

I thought I knew my rear mechs, but I've never seen one of these in the flesh.

'Blinky'? -it seemed like the right name for it....

Image

from 'The Simpsons'

cheers
Last edited by Brucey on 12 Dec 2019, 8:41pm, edited 1 time in total.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
thirdcrank
Posts: 36778
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by thirdcrank »

It would have been interesting to see a pic of one on a bike, or at least with a chain on. Does the chain go over the top jockey after going under the other two, or does it go over the first lower jockey it meets, and then take a conventional route around the other two? :?
Brucey
Posts: 44667
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by Brucey »

I think the chain goes around the outside of the lower pair. Shimano market derailluers with extra large lower pulleys 'megarange' etc and these have additional capacity because of the extra wrap-round. This SunTour one looks to have worked in the same way.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16145
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by 531colin »

Brucey wrote:I think the chain goes around the outside of the lower pair. Shimano market derailluers with extra large lower pulleys 'megarange' etc and these have additional capacity because of the extra wrap-round. This SunTour one looks to have worked in the same way.

cheers


Thats how I had it figured........the third pulley only comes into play when the jockey cage is a fair way back, in order to take up a bit more chain.
reohn2
Posts: 45181
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by reohn2 »

Yep,definately a dead end in the evolutionary "chain" :roll:
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
User avatar
Redvee
Posts: 2469
Joined: 8 Mar 2010, 8:58pm

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by Redvee »

Shimano will rebadge it and people will buy it cause its Shimano.
reohn2
Posts: 45181
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by reohn2 »

Redvee wrote:Shimano will rebadge it and people will buy it cause its Shimano.


Like they bought the "low normal" rear mech which revolutionised cycling,NOT :?
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
BigG
Posts: 984
Joined: 7 Jun 2010, 4:29pm
Location: Devon

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by BigG »

The Suntour rear mech shown was technically successful, but not commercially so. The objective seems to have been to get the overall tooth range of a long cage mech within the physical constraints of a short cage. It is not very different in philosophy from the modern rear mechs such as the recent (current?) Suntour RD-XCR650.SGX that use a large diameter tension jockey wheel to achieve the same thing. Both ideas work well enough, but most people seem to manage without them.

Edit: A rough measurement suggests the the mech shown would have about an 8 tooth greater range than a similar length mech with only two jockey wheels. The maximum increase available commercially by using a larger jockey wheel is 5 teeth with a 15 tooth jockey wheel (as on the Suntour 650 mech mentioned above) instead of the normal 10 tooth one.
Last edited by BigG on 26 Apr 2012, 7:30pm, edited 3 times in total.
thirdcrank
Posts: 36778
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by thirdcrank »

It looks to me like an elegant solution to the "dangling derailleur" problem. (Now I've had the chain path explained. :oops: )

I'm no off-roader so I've no experience of a longer arm hitting rocks etc., but I have a Birdy so the smaller wheels take the cage near the road and care has to be taken to avoid damage.
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 19801
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by [XAP]Bob »

And looks sane for small wheelers...
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
reohn2
Posts: 45181
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by reohn2 »

[XAP]Bob wrote:And looks sane for small wheelers...

Though same effect can be achieved by large(r) jockey wheels.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
Tonyf33
Posts: 3926
Joined: 17 Nov 2007, 3:31pm
Location: Letchworth N.Herts

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by Tonyf33 »

These are ideal on early/mid 80s tourers & not just from a looks POV, I've had many an older Suntour RD work fine with indexed gears so not just friction shifting. Such a shame that Suntour went to the wall, they had lots of fantastic bits of kit and their designers sure knew how to make stuff elegant as well as functional something Shimano have rarely been able to boast about...
Their high end rd's were so light too, only superceded by very late Campagnolo Record carbon & some silly uber expensive stuff, beat the hell out of the Campag components at a much more affordable price range.
User avatar
gaz
Posts: 14657
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 12:09pm
Location: Kent

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by gaz »

Brucey wrote:I thought I knew my rear mechs, but I've never seen one of these in the flesh.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/NISHIKI-Trav ... SwSXFd7SK6 :shock:
Brucey
Posts: 44667
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by Brucey »

still have not seen one in the flesh, but found more pictures including of a model called LePree

Image

which appears to be a close relative of 'XC' otherwise and indeed Cyclone MkII with the same cage on it too (although this may be a conversion).

I have even found this conversion picture

Image

which is more than slightly horrifying....

cheers
Last edited by Brucey on 12 Dec 2019, 9:03pm, edited 1 time in total.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
gaz
Posts: 14657
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 12:09pm
Location: Kent

Re: Rear derailleur with a difference; lets call it 'Blinky'

Post by gaz »

Brucey wrote:which is more than slightly horrifying....

Would that be Suntagnolo or Camptour?
Post Reply