legal lights

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
Post Reply
seph
Posts: 198
Joined: 3 Sep 2010, 8:22pm

legal lights

Post by seph »

I'm after some battery powered LED lights that conform to the relevant BS3648 or BS6102/3 standards. I have other lights that are plenty effective enough, i just want some cheap additional lights that comply with the letter of the law, (so that in the event of an accident I wont be held partly to blame for having the wrong lights...) Can anyone tell me of any that qualify?
User avatar
Cunobelin
Posts: 10801
Joined: 6 Feb 2007, 7:22pm

Re: legal lights

Post by Cunobelin »

While you are looking, could you please also find the Holy Grail and the city of Atlantis?

The weird thing is that what you are after does not exist as there are very few lights out there that fit the standards of BS6102/3.

There is also th issue that many of the lights that do fit BS6102/3 do not meet the requirements of the road Vehicle Lighting regulations (and vice-versa)

Even when they do claim to meet BS it remains unclear whether they do...
The Cateye AU100 being stamped with the kite mark, but it only applied to the reflector not the light part ofthe unit.
Brucey
Posts: 44666
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: legal lights

Post by Brucey »

just as importantly you need a full set reflectors too, which could vary with the age of your bike.

The easiest way of being compliant with the law is to buy a set of flashing lights. Your other lights then become 'additional lights'.

It is all explained very well here;

http://www.ctc.org.uk/cyclists-library/regulations/lighting-regulations

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 19801
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: legal lights

Post by [XAP]Bob »

Or buy German K marked (?) lights - as EU harmonisation rules mean thay they should be considered legal.

They are also useful...
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
MartinC
Posts: 2134
Joined: 10 May 2007, 6:31pm
Location: Bredon

Re: legal lights

Post by MartinC »

seph wrote:.............wont be held partly to blame for having the wrong lights...


Realistically you'll always be partly to blame 'cos you're a cyclist and it's dangerous.
User avatar
gaz
Posts: 14657
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 12:09pm
Location: Kent

Re: legal lights

Post by gaz »

seph wrote:I'm after some battery powered LED lights that conform to the relevant BS3648 or BS6102/3 standards.


There are a few links in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=79705&start=15
High on a cocktail of flossy teacakes and marmalade
User avatar
meic
Posts: 19355
Joined: 1 Feb 2007, 9:37pm
Location: Caerfyrddin (Carmarthen)

Re: legal lights

Post by meic »

Cunobelin wrote:While you are looking, could you please also find the Holy Grail and the city of Atlantis?

The weird thing is that what you are after does not exist as there are very few lights out there that fit the standards of BS6102/3.

There is also th issue that many of the lights that do fit BS6102/3 do not meet the requirements of the road Vehicle Lighting regulations (and vice-versa)

Even when they do claim to meet BS it remains unclear whether they do...
The Cateye AU100 being stamped with the kite mark, but it only applied to the reflector not the light part ofthe unit.


I dont know quite how literally you meant the comment about a kite mark but the AU100 (I have one here in my hand) is clearly marked both BS6102/3 on the light part of the lens AND BS6102/2 on the reflector part of the lens.
Thirdcrank did point out that the Eurolight's BS rear lamp could possibly fail the letter of the law because the BS mark is on the body rather than the lens. I dont see any civil court case accepting that as meaning you were not adequately lit (though it could waste time and money deciding that :roll: ).
Yma o Hyd
Urticaria
Posts: 158
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 12:02pm

Re: legal lights

Post by Urticaria »

It pains me to mention it, but the Bikehut range in Halfords are often marked up as conforming to BS.
Their website is also clear about under what conditions it meets the BS, or the RVL regs.
There are some special offers at the moment, such as this or this.

It might be a good idea to keep the packaging or retain a copy of the web page, so that the light's conformance is not in doubt, as I'm not sure it is stamped on the lights. Now I come to write this, I wonder whether they are using weasel words in that they conform, but have never actually been certified?
maxwellhadley
Posts: 114
Joined: 30 Jul 2009, 12:47pm

Re: legal lights

Post by maxwellhadley »

The Brompton battery rear light is BS marked, and is available as an aftermarket accessory. It includes a reflector, and I think the marking applies to both light & reflector - I'm not able to check at the moment. This is made by Spanninga, and against expectations, fits the standard two holes back-of-rack bracket. I've got one on my Giant.
User avatar
andrew_s
Posts: 5795
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 9:29pm
Location: Gloucestershire

Re: legal lights

Post by andrew_s »

[XAP]Bob wrote:Or buy German K marked (?) lights - as EU harmonisation rules mean thay they should be considered legal.

They are also useful...

This is what I do. Get a dynamo hub, fit B+M lights*, job done for the next several years.
The K-number is specific to an approved light, so all you need to look for is that there is one. A lot of them are also have BS 6102 markings, on rear lights at least.

*other brands available, but B+M are usually better, at least without paying lots.

Brucey wrote:The easiest way of being compliant with the law is to buy a set of flashing lights. Your other lights then become 'additional lights'.

Flashing lights only provide legal lighting ifthey don't have a steady mode. That excludes almost everything that' on the market other than the Reelights. These may be illegal lighting because of fitting too low (min 350mm height, iirc), or you may not want to use then for orther reasons.
Brucey
Posts: 44666
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: legal lights

Post by Brucey »

andrew_s wrote:
Brucey wrote:The easiest way of being compliant with the law is to buy a set of flashing lights. Your other lights then become 'additional lights'.

Flashing lights only provide legal lighting if they don't have a steady mode....


true... CJ suggests that such lights with a flashing mode that isn't being used are 'legal, but not compliant' and that you might want something else as well. I wonder if there has been (or ever would be) a test case for this?

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
meic
Posts: 19355
Joined: 1 Feb 2007, 9:37pm
Location: Caerfyrddin (Carmarthen)

Re: legal lights

Post by meic »

It appears that the Eurolights that I always used to recommend have vanished along with the website for the company.

If you want a rear light which is stamped with the letters BS then it is the Cateye BS100.
Though it is a bit big and heavy for many people and the difficulty of removing batteries can mean rechargeables get damaged.
You also get the light and reflector both in one unit.

The Cateye TL LD500 has a BS reflector and is BS stamped for that alone. Now I wonder what are the chances of (in the exceedingly rare case of someone looking for BS marks) anybody noticing that the BS only applies to the reflector and not the whole unit?
This is a good light that isnt heavy or bulky and takes up little more space than the reflector which it replaces.
Yma o Hyd
User avatar
NUKe
Posts: 4161
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 11:07pm
Location: Suffolk

Re: legal lights

Post by NUKe »

seph wrote:I'm after some battery powered LED lights that conform to the relevant BS3648 or BS6102/3 standards. I have other lights that are plenty effective enough, i just want some cheap additional lights that comply with the letter of the law, (so that in the event of an accident I wont be held partly to blame for having the wrong lights...) Can anyone tell me of any that qualify?


If you have lights and they are conspicuous then don't worry about the legality of the said lights. No one as yet has been held culpable for having non standard lights. Worry about having the approriate equipment for the conditions so that the accident can be better avoided in the first place rather than conforming to a standard which is probably more about not poisoning you if you decide to eat it rather than being seen.
NUKe
_____________________________________
Brucey
Posts: 44666
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: legal lights

Post by Brucey »

meic wrote:It appears that the Eurolights that I always used to recommend have vanished along with the website for the company...


eh? Still here;

http://eurolightcycling.com/products.aspx?id=2#

with my browser, anyway.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
meic
Posts: 19355
Joined: 1 Feb 2007, 9:37pm
Location: Caerfyrddin (Carmarthen)

Re: legal lights

Post by meic »

Thank you, I was using an old link which I have gone back and modified now.

The EL153 is BS marked but on the body not the lens, not perfect but I wonder if anybody would hold that manufacturer's mistake against the user?

I have them fitted on quite a few bikes as my regulation lights, nice compact and light, not a bad light either perfectly adequate if anybody is actually looking where they are going.
Yma o Hyd
Post Reply