Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
robinlh
Posts: 170
Joined: 20 Feb 2010, 10:26pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by robinlh »

As the tubing is apparently Cod settable and the cracked chain stay was replaced I can see no reason at all why you should not reset them.
The amount of bending is very minor and steel is not exactly aluminium in its level of fatigue tolerance.
You do need what are known as egg cups,these are used to ensure that the dropouts end up reasonably parallel.
My dropout spreader is simply a piece of threaded rod,buyable from DIY stores and four bolts and flat washers.Use carefully and gradually and keep the outer bolts reasonably tight,expand by about one turn on each side sequentially.
Ideally leave very marginally tight and then check that the dropouts are parallel and correct.otherwise you may have axle problems,they split but do not bend.
My egg cups are older than most people on this forum and so am I,you can deduce therefore that this system is tried and tested.
All rear hubs should be 135,unless they are even wider.130s are a silly pointy headed fashion victim racer idea.
R
stewartpratt
Posts: 2566
Joined: 27 Dec 2007, 5:12pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by stewartpratt »

robinlh wrote:the tubing is apparently Cod settable and the cracked chain stay was replaced


I dunno, it still seems fishy to me.
Samuel D
Posts: 3088
Joined: 8 Mar 2015, 11:05pm
Location: Paris
Contact:

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by Samuel D »

stewartpratt wrote:
robinlh wrote:the tubing is apparently Cod settable and the cracked chain stay was replaced


I dunno, it still seems fishy to me.

Good catch!
beardy
Posts: 3382
Joined: 23 Feb 2010, 4:10pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by beardy »

130s are a silly pointy headed fashion victim racer idea.


What? Even if they date back to when the racers were using 126mm? :roll:
User avatar
recordacefromnew
Posts: 334
Joined: 21 Dec 2012, 3:17pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by recordacefromnew »

Samuel D wrote:
stewartpratt wrote:
robinlh wrote:the tubing is apparently Cod settable and the cracked chain stay was replaced


I dunno, it still seems fishy to me.


Good catch!


Y'all think the framebuilder's explanation is a red herring?
Steveo2020
Posts: 215
Joined: 26 Apr 2012, 8:57pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by Steveo2020 »

I think they just have bigger fish to fry
Brucey
Posts: 44664
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by Brucey »

we knew you'd bite eventually... just an idea I'm floating...

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Vorpal
Moderator
Posts: 20717
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 3:34pm
Location: Not there ;)

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by Vorpal »

I'm floundering. I don't get all the jokes. :wink:
“In some ways, it is easier to be a dissident, for then one is without responsibility.”
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom
TonyR
Posts: 5390
Joined: 31 Aug 2008, 12:51pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by TonyR »

Go round to their plaice and get them to put it in whiting or you could end up squids out of pocket. :wink:
robinlh
Posts: 170
Joined: 20 Feb 2010, 10:26pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by robinlh »

There must be a better plaice for all this carping on.
pete75
Posts: 16370
Joined: 24 Jul 2007, 2:37pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by pete75 »

recordacefromnew wrote:
Y'all think the framebuilder's explanation is a red herring?


Yeah but don't tell him Pike....
'Give me my bike, a bit of sunshine - and a stop-off for a lunchtime pint - and I'm a happy man.' - Reg Baker
robinlh
Posts: 170
Joined: 20 Feb 2010, 10:26pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by robinlh »

It is the amount of dish in the wheel that matters.
He who taught me the rudiments of wheel building over half a century ago just could not really accept dishing,although,like me,he had to accept it.
A dishless seven speed wheel should be possible,but such hardware as is available is ether expensive or of poor quality.
Were I building a truly expedition ear wheel,a forty spoke 140/145mm tandem hub might be the way to go,but then three the rim problem..........
But to build a ten speed rear wheel up on a 130mm hub when you can just as easily use a 135 is just technical illiteracy.
R
TonyR
Posts: 5390
Joined: 31 Aug 2008, 12:51pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by TonyR »

robinlh wrote:It is the amount of dish in the wheel that matters.
He who taught me the rudiments of wheel building over half a century ago just could not really accept dishing,although,like me,he had to accept it.
A dishless seven speed wheel should be possible,but such hardware as is available is ether expensive or of poor quality.
Were I building a truly expedition ear wheel,a forty spoke 140/145mm tandem hub might be the way to go,but then three the rim problem..........
But to build a ten speed rear wheel up on a 130mm hub when you can just as easily use a 135 is just technical illiteracy.
R


Has anyone ever had a rear wheel fail because of the dish or is it just a theoretical problem i.e. it would be stronger if it wasn't dished but it works fine as it is.
stewartpratt
Posts: 2566
Joined: 27 Dec 2007, 5:12pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by stewartpratt »

TonyR wrote:Has anyone ever had a rear wheel fail because of the dish or is it just a theoretical problem i.e. it would be stronger if it wasn't dished but it works fine as it is.


Well, any time you have a fatigue failure of an NDS spoke or a stress fracture of a DS spoke it would be fair to argue that with less dish the failure would have been less likely to occur.

Not quite sure how all this really relates to the OP's issue, though.
Brucey
Posts: 44664
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Frame back from framebuilders with wrong rear spacing

Post by Brucey »

TonyR wrote:
Has anyone ever had a rear wheel fail because of the dish or is it just a theoretical problem...


I've seen many wheel failures that were directly attributable to the dish on the wheel. Not 'just theoretical'.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Post Reply