20m monopole on a shared pavement
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 14 May 2021, 8:27am
20m monopole on a shared pavement
I'm new here so sorry if I'm raising an issue that's been discussed before.
I live in Birmingham near a road where "3" (the telecoms co) has applied for planning permission to install a 20 metre monopole and two surrounding cabinets on a pavement which is a shared cycle lane and footpath. It will be in the cycle lane section, in an area that is wider because it used to contain a bus shelter. The precise location is also at the junction of a small footpath leading on to that shared pavement and there are already 6 lamp- or signposts along the side of the pavement, within a few metres of the proposed monopole site. Does anyone have any experience of challenging this kind of application and of the relevant guidelines? Thanks for any help. Best wishes
I live in Birmingham near a road where "3" (the telecoms co) has applied for planning permission to install a 20 metre monopole and two surrounding cabinets on a pavement which is a shared cycle lane and footpath. It will be in the cycle lane section, in an area that is wider because it used to contain a bus shelter. The precise location is also at the junction of a small footpath leading on to that shared pavement and there are already 6 lamp- or signposts along the side of the pavement, within a few metres of the proposed monopole site. Does anyone have any experience of challenging this kind of application and of the relevant guidelines? Thanks for any help. Best wishes
-
- Posts: 585
- Joined: 30 May 2020, 12:43am
Re: 20m monopole on a shared pavement
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://as ... 65c5vEiDfe
My thinking is moving pedestrians/cyclists in the road defeats the purpose of a pavement and cycle path.
My thinking is moving pedestrians/cyclists in the road defeats the purpose of a pavement and cycle path.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 14 May 2021, 8:27am
Re: 20m monopole on a shared pavement
Thanks a lot. V kind. I will at least refer to these guidelines as sth to be taken on board
-
- Posts: 2445
- Joined: 7 Jul 2008, 12:52am
Re: 20m monopole on a shared pavement
The relevant guidelines (LTN 1/20) state that pavements shouldn't be shared anymore.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 14 May 2021, 8:27am
Re: 20m monopole on a shared pavement
Thanks. I wonder if we can interpret that to mean that poles should not be added to cycle ways?
-
- Posts: 585
- Joined: 30 May 2020, 12:43am
Re: 20m monopole on a shared pavement
Pdf download and read and highlight the sections.
I see 8-80 plus inclusive, so as for example Charlotte's tandems I gave a donation to helps those who have difficulties it.could be said putting an obstacle in a cycle lane goes against national guidance.
Either set the obstacles off a cycle lane or site else where.
I see 8-80 plus inclusive, so as for example Charlotte's tandems I gave a donation to helps those who have difficulties it.could be said putting an obstacle in a cycle lane goes against national guidance.
Either set the obstacles off a cycle lane or site else where.
-
- Posts: 2445
- Joined: 7 Jul 2008, 12:52am
Re: 20m monopole on a shared pavement
The guidance is that the pavement shouldn't be shared
Pedestrians should not be required to share space with cyclists and cyclists should not be directed to ride on the pavement.
Putting street furniture on a wide pavement is not a problem for the appropriate users of pavements (ie pedestrrians) - the problem is treating cyclists as wheeled pedestrians.
Pedestrians should not be required to share space with cyclists and cyclists should not be directed to ride on the pavement.
Putting street furniture on a wide pavement is not a problem for the appropriate users of pavements (ie pedestrrians) - the problem is treating cyclists as wheeled pedestrians.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 14 May 2021, 8:27am
Re: 20m monopole on a shared pavement
Thanks very much
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 14 May 2021, 8:27am
Re: 20m monopole on a shared pavement
Thank you very much
-
- Posts: 585
- Joined: 30 May 2020, 12:43am
Re: 20m monopole on a shared pavement
Another thought the pavements went through a period of widening locally here, is there a standard A or B road pavement width and does said cabinet contravene it?
My thoughts are the council may or may not bother to flow legislation and pointing out the legislation makes it hard to whitewash over it.
My thoughts are the council may or may not bother to flow legislation and pointing out the legislation makes it hard to whitewash over it.