The one point that has been missed:
Maybe a campaign to make the media, drivers, politicians, etc aware how pedestrians are the worst light jumpers may take a bit of the tediously repetitive pressure off us cyclists.
It would be such a massive own goal for cycle campaigners to do something like that:
- It would instantly backfire because people would point to the legality of pedestrians crossing the road compared to the illegality of cyclists running red lights. Cue opportunity for more "why do cyclists think they are above the law" articles.
- It would victimise and alienate our greatest potential ally, the other huge group of travellers who have been marginalised, endangered and inconvenienced by the prioritisation of motor traffic.
- In turn it would fan the flames of pedestrian/cyclist conflict.
- It would play right into the hands of the motor lobby which would happily see pedestrian traffic regulated ("jaywalking" laws etc.) and wishes road safety discussion to focus upon the trivial misdemeanours of vulnerable road users rather than the vehicles which actually cause of injury and death.
- It would disadvantage cyclists who would suddenly feel obliged to obey red cycle lamps on toucan crossings. Some cyclists inevitably ignoring such lights would be brought up as evidence of our blatant hypocrisy.
- It would completely miss the point by failing to understand the inconvenience suffered by pedestrians. At least we only have a single traffic light per junction - pedestrians often have four.
Not quite half a page...