Annoying Twit wrote:The point about drivers killing pedestrians by running red lights is a good comeback to those who criticise (admittedly justifiably) cyclists for running red lights. Both actions (cars running the light and cyclists running the light) are wrong, but the consequences of cars jumping red lights are more serious.
When I was cycling in New Zealand at Christmas, it appeared that drivers running red lights is even more of a problem than it is now. I frequently saw cars crossing in front of me long after my light had turned green.
The standard anti-cyclist narrative, is "not passed a test, no insurance, pays no tax, reckless and doesn't respect the laws of the road, jumping red lights, not wearing a helmet", particularly where fatalities are discussed. From a sample of about 100 cyclists fatalities, the tally was:
Cyclist RLJ 2
Motorist RLJ 3
Cyclist at (other) fault 30%
Motorist at (other) fault 65%
It is casual, usually unintended, negligence that is the real killer.
I think most cyclist RLJ is treating a red light as a give way sign rather than a suicidal right-of-way challenge. And if they were caught more often they might do it less (same as motorists with speeding, drink driving). I occasionally point out to motorist friends that they have crossed many junctions without waiting for a green light - that's what the give way system does.
As regards NZ, whilst in UK the motorist/cyclist accident blame ratio is ~2:1, in Australia it's more like 8:1.