Cyril Haearn wrote:People, cycles, dogs, trees etc are *hazards* according to a *bad* (british assoc of drivers)
http://www.abd.org.uk/ shirley?
Cyril Haearn wrote:People, cycles, dogs, trees etc are *hazards* according to a *bad* (british assoc of drivers)
Utterly agree.Cyril Haearn wrote:The new mini should be called the maxi
Bonefishblues wrote:Cyril Haearn wrote:People, cycles, dogs, trees etc are *hazards* according to a *bad* (british assoc of drivers)
http://www.abd.org.uk/ shirley?
Mick F wrote:Utterly agree.Cyril Haearn wrote:The new mini should be called the maxi
BMW should be taken to task regarding the trades description act.
Maybe that's why it's called MINI and not Mini.
simonhill wrote:Thanks for the replies (so far).
I am very well aware why cars are wider - safety features, strengthening, etc and its good to see that people have also noticed the problem.
However, nobody has actually addressed the question why isn't more made of the wide vehicle thing. We can't really expect the manufacturers to shout too loud, but there are lots of other interested parties that could. CycleUK for starters, other interest groups, the Transport Ministry, politicians, even car mags, etc, etc My point is that we all need to shout about it, then someone might hear and realise what a dead end ever increasing size is.
You are more likely to hear someone on a property buying show complain that their car won't fit in the garage than you are to hear a safety or transport advocate talking about it.
Maybe if the lady in the big car had been clearly told that this one was xx cms bigger than her last one and would be a pain to park, she might have thought twice before buying.
I have been cycling in Japan quite a bit recently and was initially surprised that most of their cars are fairly small. Their great behemoth 4x4s are rarely seen on their roads. This got me wondering why and I found out that they have a weight tax new for cars and a reduced annual tax for small engine lightweight less than 660cc cars (kei cars). There are also other restrictions like needing somewhere to park it before you buy - but I'm no expert so google for more info. Our Govt could easily do these things to encourage sensible sized cars, but................(fill in your particular bug bear here).
reohn2 wrote:Grandad wrote:I noticed this back when the first BMW Mini was released. Having owned an old Mini, I went to have a look to see if they were worth buying. There was nothing "mini" about the new ones at all,
I refer to the new one as being a mini on steroids
But why be so surprised about the new Mini not being anything like the old,the name is just a marketing concept.Is the newest Fiesta anything remotely like the th first one?
pwa wrote:Mick F wrote:Utterly agree.Cyril Haearn wrote:The new mini should be called the maxi
BMW should be taken to task regarding the trades description act.
Maybe that's why it's called MINI and not Mini.
Yes, the current Mini isn't mini at all. But though I have fond memories of driving a real mini, I'm not sure I'd buy one today if they still made them. They were uncomfortable, cramped, inclined to rust and needed a lot of tinkering.
reohn2 wrote:simonhill wrote:Thanks for the replies (so far).
I am very well aware why cars are wider - safety features, strengthening, etc and its good to see that people have also noticed the problem.
However, nobody has actually addressed the question why isn't more made of the wide vehicle thing. We can't really expect the manufacturers to shout too loud, but there are lots of other interested parties that could. CycleUK for starters, other interest groups, the Transport Ministry, politicians, even car mags, etc, etc My point is that we all need to shout about it, then someone might hear and realise what a dead end ever increasing size is.
You are more likely to hear someone on a property buying show complain that their car won't fit in the garage than you are to hear a safety or transport advocate talking about it.
Maybe if the lady in the big car had been clearly told that this one was xx cms bigger than her last one and would be a pain to park, she might have thought twice before buying.
I have been cycling in Japan quite a bit recently and was initially surprised that most of their cars are fairly small. Their great behemoth 4x4s are rarely seen on their roads. This got me wondering why and I found out that they have a weight tax new for cars and a reduced annual tax for small engine lightweight less than 660cc cars (kei cars). There are also other restrictions like needing somewhere to park it before you buy - but I'm no expert so google for more info. Our Govt could easily do these things to encourage sensible sized cars, but................(fill in your particular bug bear here).
The problem is that our government is Kinnock to the motor and oil companies,it cares more about tax garnered by tax than it does about the welbeing of it's citizens and is already teetering on the edge of oblivion with no majority so the last thing it will do is hurt or upset the motorist in any way shape or form.
Meanwhile the motor companies keep on advertising wide open roads,near sports car performance,living the dream as we continue to choke.
We can dream on in the opposite direction if we think the government and motorists will listen.
---------------------------
Someone mentioned about car parking spaces on carparks,IMHO the best thing to be done is to re paint the bays slanted instead of being at the stupid 90degrees to the access lanes.
On chargeable carparks charge on vehicle weight(which is directly related to size and therefore pollution),on multi stoy carparks make the biggest vehicles par on the upper floors.
pwa wrote:Mick F wrote:Utterly agree.Cyril Haearn wrote:The new mini should be called the maxi
BMW should be taken to task regarding the trades description act.
Maybe that's why it's called MINI and not Mini.
Yes, the current Mini isn't mini at all. But though I have fond memories of driving a real mini, I'm not sure I'd buy one today if they still made them. They were uncomfortable, cramped, inclined to rust and needed a lot of tinkering.
reohn2 wrote:pwa wrote:Mick F wrote:Utterly agree.
BMW should be taken to task regarding the trades description act.
Maybe that's why it's called MINI and not Mini.
Yes, the current Mini isn't mini at all. But though I have fond memories of driving a real mini, I'm not sure I'd buy one today if they still made them. They were uncomfortable, cramped, inclined to rust and needed a lot of tinkering.
In other words a pile of poop
Personally I never understood the attraction of them.
Cyril Haearn wrote:reohn2 wrote:Grandad wrote:I refer to the new one as being a mini on steroids
But why be so surprised about the new Mini not being anything like the old,the name is just a marketing concept.Is the newest Fiesta anything remotely like the th first one?
I had a fiesta mk1 (made in 1977)
It seemed very B.I.G to me back then cos it was my first vehicle, I had only ridden a bike before, but it would seem small now
pwa wrote:reohn2 wrote:pwa wrote:
Yes, the current Mini isn't mini at all. But though I have fond memories of driving a real mini, I'm not sure I'd buy one today if they still made them. They were uncomfortable, cramped, inclined to rust and needed a lot of tinkering.
In other words a pile of poop
Personally I never understood the attraction of them.
They looked good (to me) and the went around corners like they were on rails.
Same defects as all cars of that era.
Cyril Haearn wrote:Memories can be deceptive
Fortunately
Remember double-declutching, cross-ply tyres etc etc?
And Marc Bolan?
Cyril Haearn wrote:pwa wrote:Mick F wrote:Utterly agree.
BMW should be taken to task regarding the trades description act.
Maybe that's why it's called MINI and not Mini.
Yes, the current Mini isn't mini at all. But though I have fond memories of driving a real mini, I'm not sure I'd buy one today if they still made them. They were uncomfortable, cramped, inclined to rust and needed a lot of tinkering.
The little smart is the equivalent of the mini
It would be quite possible to make reliable simple *old* minis now but what was the payload? Could 4 big muscular cyclists fit in?