Why isn't there a cycles on trains campaigns from Cycling UK?

StephenW
Posts: 69
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 11:33am

Re: Why isn't there a cycles on trains campaigns from Cycling UK?

Postby StephenW » 16 Jul 2018, 8:51pm

Vorpal asked:
What are cycle spaces, and where do Tandem and Trailer go?


I think it would be good if a standard bicycle were defined. If the standard bicycle doesn't fit easily in all the cycle spaces, they are not cycle spaces. The standard bicycle should be large - I suggest the largest-framed men's roadster commonly available, with the seat and handlebars as high as they go.

I'm ambivalent about whether the bikes hang vertically from hooks or are supported horizontally. The key points to me are consistency and that a large adult bicycle fits easily.


If trailers can be detached and in some way folded or dismantled such that they are the size of a large suitcase, no special provision is needed. Otherwise, a bike+trailer could be considered as a tandem.

I think that solo cycles should be carried on every train (although on peak-time commuting trains there would only be a small number of spaces, which must be paid for). Although it would be nice, it is not so important to me that tandems be carried on every train. Instead, I think that it should be possible to get from any GB station to any other one with a tandem, although this might require taking a slower route or travelling at certain times of day.

Vorpal
Moderator
Posts: 15092
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 3:34pm
Location: Not there ;)

Re: Why isn't there a cycles on trains campaigns from Cycling UK?

Postby Vorpal » 17 Jul 2018, 7:48am

StephenW wrote:Vorpal asked:
What are cycle spaces, and where do Tandem and Trailer go?


I think it would be good if a standard bicycle were defined. If the standard bicycle doesn't fit easily in all the cycle spaces, they are not cycle spaces. The standard bicycle should be large - I suggest the largest-framed men's roadster commonly available, with the seat and handlebars as high as they go.

By implication, families whose children are not yet cycling independently, many disabled cyclists, and people who use trikes or recumbents don't have the same rights of access as those who ride a standard upright.
“In some ways, it is easier to be a dissident, for then one is without responsibility.”
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom

StephenW
Posts: 69
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 11:33am

Re: Why isn't there a cycles on trains campaigns from Cycling UK?

Postby StephenW » 17 Jul 2018, 9:47pm

I sometimes take my SWB recumbent on the train. It fits OK in a standard bike space. A LWB recumbent would be a different matter - it would be classed as a tandem in my view. I think that a maximum length should be defined for a "standard bicycle", and anything longer than this is classed as a tandem.

Quite a lot of recumbent trikes are foldable.

Tag-along bikes, if they can easily be detached, could be classed as two standard bicycles. Otherwise they would count as one tandem. Trailers, if they can be detached and folded such that they fit in luggage racks, just count as normal luggage. Otherwise, bike+trailer=one tandem.

I think that family cycling trips are unlikely to be taking place at peak commuting time, and perhaps time is not of the essence on these types of trips. Therefore, I think that the kind of restrictions on tandems and tandem-equivalents which I am talking about may not be such a big drawback in practice.

atoz
Posts: 282
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 4:50pm

Re: Why isn't there a cycles on trains campaigns from Cycling UK?

Postby atoz » 24 Jul 2018, 5:24pm

Just been looking through the new Cycle mag. Under Letters there has appeared one on bikes and trains. None, of course on why Cycling Uk aren't mounting a highly visible campaign on the issue. And no mention of this thread in the piece on the Cycle UK forum. To be sure I've no problem with the other subject it covers- but some mention of the fact that this has been an active thread would be good.

The silence is deafening. Based on this and the lack of noticeable action on Cycling UK's part over some time, I can only conclude that we can't have too much faith in our national cycling organisation on this one. Is it political pressure, poor morale, or just plain apathy?

brynpoeth
Posts: 5804
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: Why isn't there a cycles on trains campaigns from Cycling UK?

Postby brynpoeth » 24 Jul 2018, 5:31pm

Maybe it is logical* and who knows, there may have even been some market research
*One imagines that drive-cycling tragically is much more popular than taking bikes on trains, is cuk logically not giving much attention to a small minority?

Speculation of course, for once :wink:
Alternative facts welcome
Alternative facts welcome .. Cycling? Of course, but it is far better on a Gillott

atoz
Posts: 282
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 4:50pm

Re: Why isn't there a cycles on trains campaigns from Cycling UK?

Postby atoz » 6 Aug 2018, 11:51am

brynpoeth wrote:Maybe it is logical* and who knows, there may have even been some market research
*One imagines that drive-cycling tragically is much more popular than taking bikes on trains, is cuk logically not giving much attention to a small minority?

Speculation of course, for once :wink:
Alternative facts welcome


I wonder how small the minority really is. And maybe it's small precisely because of the problems taking bikes on trains, which didn't use to be the case. Acccording to that. Cycling UK have the same approach to this subject that a lot of people have to cycling as a whole. Not helpful.

I still take the view that this is a political issue really, which would explain why CUK aren't pushing it. I noticed a cosy picture in the magazine of Jeremy Hunt, who is a local MP near CUK HQ. Rather too close for comfort to the cosy feature on the Bottomley's in the 1980's, who were then of course local MPs. I've yet to see a cosy feature on any local Labour MPs- why not Jeremy Corbyn, that well known cyclist and Labour party leader? Or is he the "wrong sort of politician"?