Does anyone have car doors 1.5m wide?????

9494arnold
Posts: 824
Joined: 21 Jan 2007, 3:13pm

Re: Does anyone have car doors 1.5m wide?????

Postby 9494arnold » 14 Sep 2018, 12:30pm

I am a retired Police Officer, and I taught my wife to drive years ago. When she asked me about overtaking cyclists (we both were and still are regulars on the bike) I said "Give them enough room to fall off without you hitting them", perhaps that's the subliminal message being sent here without wishing to frighten the public at large. Also relevant to parked cars and door opening?.
Have to say I am heartened by the "Close Pass" initiative , someone who isn't used to traffic can be put off by a close pass, wobble a bit and if the following car is also a bit close it can all go wrong very quickly I'd suggest.
I speak as someone who was put through a hedge by a close pass by a Jaguar and also had paint off the offending vehicle on the track nuts on the back of my trike, I was taken off my intended path and into a side road by this clown , I think it's a miracle I didn't end up underneath the car .
(PS I have a Sunbeam Alpine with quite long doors which I venture out in occasionally.)
I do like the French idea that if a car collides with a bike there is a presumption of guilt on behalf of the car driver ( I know the Civil Libertarians won't like this) :roll:

User avatar
mjr
Posts: 13326
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: Does anyone have car doors 1.5m wide?????

Postby mjr » 14 Sep 2018, 1:06pm

9494arnold wrote:I do like the French idea that if a car collides with a bike there is a presumption of guilt on behalf of the car driver ( I know the Civil Libertarians won't like this) :roll:

Is there? Not just the Dutch presumption of liability?
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.

9494arnold
Posts: 824
Joined: 21 Jan 2007, 3:13pm

Re: Does anyone have car doors 1.5m wide?????

Postby 9494arnold » 14 Sep 2018, 1:45pm

I believe so. I could be wrong however. :oops: :roll:

FasterFerret
Posts: 201
Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 3:19pm

Re: Does anyone have car doors 1.5m wide?????

Postby FasterFerret » 14 Sep 2018, 7:25pm

Some interesting reading on here:

https://www.slatergordon.co.uk/media-ce ... vs-europe/

Cut down a little if you don't want to read the whole thing (or if it moves in the future):

The Law in Europe

In French RTA cases... the non-driver victim, save for a few exceptions, is compensated in full for their injuries regardless of fault, unless it was "inexcusable and constituted the sole cause of the damage." However, the driver remains liable for their own faults and so depending on the extent of their fault compensation can be reduced by a certain percentage or even withheld.

In the Netherlands, ... there is strong legal protection for cyclists. Article 185 of the Wegenverkeerswet introduced the concept of presumed liability in circumstances involving a collision between a motor vehicle and a cyclist/pedestrian on a public road.

The exception to presumed liability only occurs where the motorist is at no fault whatsoever, in which case there is no liability. In comparison to courts in the UK, a cyclist involved in an accident with a motor vehicle will almost certainly recover damages. In cases which would have failed in the UK, a Dutch court would only make a relatively small finding of contributory negligence.

In Spain, ..."The motor vehicle driver is responsible, for the risk created by driving such vehicles, damage to persons or property caused through his driving.”

In Denmark, ...a system of presumed liability in 1986. Drivers are automatically liable unless they can prove that the accident was unavoidable and not due to the negligence on their part.

There are similar ... systems in Italy, creating a no-fault liability for damage caused by a vehicle in motion, while Germany makes vehicle owners strictly liable for any damage caused by their operation unless the driver can prove that the accident was caused by “force majeure” or unforeseeable circumstances.

In Sweden, ... the person who suffers injury as a result of a road traffic accident has the right to compensation regardless of fault or negligence by the driver or owner of the car. Liability must be covered by compulsory traffic insurance. The concept of contributory negligence has been almost completely abandoned and is only permitted as a defence in exceptional cases where the victim is guilty of intentional gross negligence.

thirdcrank
Posts: 28648
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Does anyone have car doors 1.5m wide?????

Postby thirdcrank » 14 Sep 2018, 7:42pm

We're leaving Europe so it's not coming here anytime soon.

brynpoeth
Posts: 10560
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: Does anyone have car doors 1.5m wide?????

Postby brynpoeth » 6 Jul 2019, 8:48am

RickH wrote:
FasterFerret wrote:"The standard width of a grand piano is also about 5' "

http://www.bluebookofpianos.com/types.html

We recommend that you leave the width of a...

Grand Piano

between you and the cyclist.

Are you implying we should all tow a grand piano as a safety measure to ensure safe overtaking? :twisted:

Surely an upright would be better so you can turn it sideways to filter through narrow gaps! :lol:

Saw someone with a guitar across the luggage rack, sticks out a bit left and right, should stop PoBs undertaking
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we love life

Hobbs1951
Posts: 369
Joined: 15 Apr 2014, 10:48am

Re: Does anyone have car doors 1.5m wide?????

Postby Hobbs1951 » 6 Jul 2019, 10:13am

My Mercedes coupe doors are quite long, when open therefore quite wide - I'd guess 1.5 metres (not measured them).

John.

rfryer
Posts: 636
Joined: 7 Feb 2013, 3:58pm

Re: Does anyone have car doors 1.5m wide?????

Postby rfryer » 6 Jul 2019, 1:58pm

thirdcrank wrote:Re the grand piano, at first thought the idea of something big to visualise as the basis of a campaign seems attractive but we have to remember that the current advice is based on leaving as much room as you would for a car and we wouldn't be discussing it now if that hadn't failed utterly.

I personally think that the emboldened advice above is very poor. Drivers will often leave considerably less space when overtaking a car then they should when overtaking a cyclist. And when overtaking a car it's less of an issue; if it goes wrong they're more likely to lose some paintwork than a life.