If anybody wanted to start a campaign about this, here's a case to quote Dartford Crossing death crash lorry driver watching TV
Jurors heard he had twice been caught using his phone while driving and had 12 penalty points on his licence before the crash. He had been allowed by magistrates to continue driving due to extreme hardship.
That's a poignant case, clearly, and he has gone to prison for a very long time.
Are there any statistics as to the propensity of drivers to be involved in accidents when they continue to drive after establishing exceptional hardship?
I don't think you do 77 in a 40 limit by accidentally losing concentration. You do it because of an attitude. A ban is the only thing that is likely to prove effective on that sort of mentality.
I don't think you do 77 in a 40 limit by accidentally losing concentration. You do it because of an attitude. A ban is the only thing that is likely to prove effective on that sort of mentality.
He was. He was talking nonsense. The Magistrate saw through it.
I don't think you do 77 in a 40 limit by accidentally losing concentration. You do it because of an attitude. A ban is the only thing that is likely to prove effective on that sort of mentality.
Yes but three months is too short - the default for twelve points is six months so he was treated leniently. With his existing eleven points and another six for this offence he now has a grand total of seventeen. Next time he's up in court with some more points the default is a 12 month ban based on the not unreasonable assumption he's there within three years of this ban.
'Give me my bike, a bit of sunshine - and a stop-off for a lunchtime pint - and I'm a happy man.' - Reg Baker
How about something more reasonable? Say a years ban for every mph over the limit? No exceptions whatsoever. An idiot is still an idiot even if he thinks he has an excuse.