Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

thirdcrank
Posts: 36776
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by thirdcrank »

Does anybody believe that the possibility of avoiding a totting-up ban by pleading exceptional hardship doesn't weaken the deterrent effect, especially when some people seem convinced that a finding of "special reasons" not to disqualify is almost guaranteed?
Bonefishblues
Posts: 11009
Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
Location: Near Bicester Oxon

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by Bonefishblues »

I can believe those who could afford to make alternative arrangements for transport might be careless about the possibility, but I don't think that the average person either believes it's a dead cert, nor relishes an appearance before the Magistrates.
pwa
Posts: 17366
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by pwa »

Bonefishblues wrote:But it's the probability of being caught, not the severity of the punishment that drives behavioural compliance.

He does get caught. With monotonous regularity, hence the copious points.
basingstoke123
Posts: 202
Joined: 13 Feb 2008, 10:05pm

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by basingstoke123 »

Bonefishblues wrote:But it's the probability of being caught, not the severity of the punishment that drives behavioural compliance.

Someone who already has points already has been caught! And to get close to 12 points, caught more than once. It seems that some always have points - as points expire, they gain more.
Bonefishblues
Posts: 11009
Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
Location: Near Bicester Oxon

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by Bonefishblues »

You both miss my point, I think.

This gentleman has indeed been caught multiple times doing something (although we don't know how he accrued his points, do we, unless I missed it?), but road enforcement is such that there's a widespread (and well-founded, according to many posters here) perception that one can continue to drive as one wishes almost with impunity.
Cyril Haearn
Posts: 15215
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by Cyril Haearn »

"exceptional hardship" is suffered by those who are killed or crippled by criminal drivers
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
User avatar
Cunobelin
Posts: 10801
Joined: 6 Feb 2007, 7:22pm

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by Cunobelin »

Bez wrote:I’m compelled to wonder what is the ulterior motive here.



A couple of weeks without free advertising?
Bonefishblues
Posts: 11009
Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
Location: Near Bicester Oxon

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by Bonefishblues »

Cyril Haearn wrote:"exceptional hardship" is suffered by those who are killed or crippled by criminal drivers

Indeed, for the latter in any event. But what we need is a better definition* in the particular context of this thread - if any - I know there is a significant school of thought which would wish for it to be an automatic ban, irrespective of circumstances or hardship caused.

*or better, and more consistent application, perhaps.
reohn2
Posts: 45158
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by reohn2 »

The system is there to be abused if one knows the ropes,it's similar to taxes avoidance,the "loopholes" are written in IMO.
Add to that a total lack of traffic policing and you have the current free for all witnessed daily on UK roads.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
thirdcrank
Posts: 36776
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by thirdcrank »

Re "exceptional hardship," this is a case of unintended consequences. When compulsory totting up bans were introduced, there were cases of magistrates not imposing the ban for what might be termed "hardship." eg Driver losing their job. In a futile attempt to tighten this up, the term "exceptional hardship" was introduced. Little changed: largely the same attitudes among magistrates, well-publicised cases of people with a shedful of points keeping their licence, and unnecessary deaths like the one in my most recent link. I have posted before about the difficulties of enforcing driving bans but I fancy their are few disqualified drivers regularly employed driving an HGV.
Bmblbzzz
Posts: 6258
Joined: 18 May 2012, 7:56pm
Location: From here to there.

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by Bmblbzzz »

Cyril Haearn wrote:"exceptional hardship" is suffered by those who are killed or crippled by criminal drivers

A good point that deserves wider publicity.
fastpedaller
Posts: 3435
Joined: 10 Jul 2014, 1:12pm
Location: Norfolk

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by fastpedaller »

In my book these poor drivers should just get the bus or use a bike - If they need a car (and will suffer hardship without it) then they should drive correctly so there's no danger of losing their licence! Simple as that.
irc
Posts: 5192
Joined: 3 Dec 2008, 2:22pm
Location: glasgow

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by irc »

fastpedaller wrote:In my book these poor drivers should just get the bus or use a bike - If they need a car (and will suffer hardship without it) then they should drive correctly so there's no danger of losing their licence! Simple as that.


Correct. If someone with 9 points feels their licence is vital then avoid speeding. Simple.
User avatar
Lance Dopestrong
Posts: 1306
Joined: 18 Sep 2014, 1:52pm
Location: Duddington, in the belly button of England

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by Lance Dopestrong »

fastpedaller wrote:In my book these poor drivers should just get the bus or use a bike - If they need a car (and will suffer hardship without it) then they should drive correctly so there's no danger of losing their licence! Simple as that.


You got my vote.
MIAS L5.1 instructor - advanded road and off road skills, FAST aid and casualty care, defensive tactics, SAR skills, nav, group riding, maintenance, ride and group leader qual'd.
Cytec 2 - exponent of hammer applied brute force.
Bonefishblues
Posts: 11009
Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
Location: Near Bicester Oxon

Re: Nick Freeman Attacks "exceptional hardship"

Post by Bonefishblues »

fastpedaller wrote:In my book these poor drivers should just get the bus or use a bike - If they need a car (and will suffer hardship without it) then they should drive correctly so there's no danger of losing their licence! Simple as that.

And the drivers who accrue points for any one of 2 or 3 dozen reasons unrelated to poor driving, would they be treated in the same way?
Post Reply