And again. A back-door route stopping any major increase in cycling as a transport mode rather than recreational luxury.
Cycling/cyclists do very little for the economy. Pay lip service, make sure doesn't actually impact on the private car market.
And again. A back-door route stopping any major increase in cycling as a transport mode rather than recreational luxury.
That's not true. See https://www.cyclinguk.org/campaigning/v ... nd-economy - just the Cycle to Work Scheme generates at least £72m a year, while on the touring side, mountain biking and leisure cycle tourism contributes about £300m a year to the economy in Scotland alone.
Time will tell.
A vast proportion of driving is purely recreational, so ... so what?
Please, no more!!! I think R4, Mr Loophole et al have reminded us of the many "alternative" views available.
That's only because they haven't discovered Strava yet.simonineaston wrote: ↑17 Jun 2021, 1:22pm The only guys who seem to have got it right are so-called indiginous or aboriginal populations - they must be ruddy livid!! I don't think they use bikes, tho... kayaks, maybe
AH, then I guess that was very helpful.thirdcrank wrote: ↑17 Jun 2021, 2:35pmNo. They kindly pointed out for the benefit of those of us who were commenting without having heard the programme that that was proposal discussed - not plates.
As far as I can see the Japanese sticker is a small thing which could not be read on a moving bike. It looks as if it is to establish ownership in case of theft, not for catching those terrible scofflaw cyclists who kill so many pedestrians.