meic wrote:Some excellent public art along many urban cycle tracks.
All provided totally free by graffiti artists.
I agree some public art/graffiti can be very good.
meic wrote:Some excellent public art along many urban cycle tracks.
All provided totally free by graffiti artists.
reohn2 wrote:meic wrote:Some excellent public art along many urban cycle tracks.
All provided totally free by graffiti artists.
I agree some public art/graffiti can be very good.
Bmblbzzz wrote:As to needing art on sustrans paths and similar; it's not necessary in itself, but we need more than our pure necessities in order to make life pleasant.
reohn2 wrote:meic wrote:Some excellent public art along many urban cycle tracks.
All provided totally free by graffiti artists.
I agree some public art/graffiti can be very good.
mattsccm wrote:As many have said, nothing that costs enough to reduce the quality of the path. Topical lumps of metal/machinery that can't be nicked don't look too bad in an industrial setting but in a rural landscape less so. In a natural setting nothing is best. Anything bought from some expensive source is daft.
Bmblbzzz wrote:The Angel of the North is a major tourist attraction, drawing sightseers to Gateshead. It's spawned imitators (or inspirees) as far afield as Australia and, according to Wikipedia, even the most expensive item ever to be valued by Antiques Roadshow. But most of all, it makes people happy to see it. Happy is actually rather a one-dimensional word to describe an art work. As for the cost of it was, again according to Wikipedia, £800,000 and was mostly from lottery funding.
Bmblbzzz wrote:Your first sentence is key: "Art has many facets forms and meanings,not always pleasant or appreciative." Disliking art is a form or way of appreciating it as opposed to remaining oblivious. The art works which are the most loved are likely to also be the most hated precisely because they arouse strong feelings. And vice versa of course, those which receive the strongest condemnation are also the most beloved. Value for money is a term I don't think is really applicable to art but in pure economic terms I would be surprised if this sculpture has not brought more than £800,000 into the economy of Gateshead in tourism and other revenues.