Pete Owens wrote:AlaninWales wrote:I would like to see proof that use of sswear words has any correlaion with (let alone being an indicator of) IQ.
The foul langauge gives an intitial impression. I agree that this alone is not proof of the stupidity, which is confirmed by the self contradictory contents.Meanwhile the attacks on this scheme by some cyclists stem largely from the fact that it is using 'Cycle Safety Fund' money to implement what was never a good option for cyclists;
He went further than that he argued that the scheme was positively dangerous.now it has become a worse option for cyclists
And the way he now claims it has become worse is by removing the very design features he was angry about in the first place. You really couldn't make it up.
Erm - except that the bad design features were hiding an awful design.