Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
-
- Posts: 15215
- Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am
Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
Vehicles should overtake with a minimum distance, what is the rule for traffic going the other way? How much separation distance should there be?
They have no excuse for not seeing cyclists going the other way but almost none wait and / or move over in my experience, even in my leafy suburb
What is the law or HC?
Diolch
They have no excuse for not seeing cyclists going the other way but almost none wait and / or move over in my experience, even in my leafy suburb
What is the law or HC?
Diolch
Last edited by Cyril Haearn on 1 May 2017, 7:36pm, edited 1 time in total.
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
The main thing is that there is some! You know it's not enough when contact is made.
In a utopian world we can say it has to be X but who will police it? What about narrow roads? Like any regulation it's only as good as the enforcement, just look at phones, drinking, speeding.
In a utopian world we can say it has to be X but who will police it? What about narrow roads? Like any regulation it's only as good as the enforcement, just look at phones, drinking, speeding.
Convention? what's that then?
Airnimal Chameleon touring, Orbit Pro hack, Orbit Photon audax, Focus Mares AX tour, Peugeot Carbon sportive, Owen Blower vintage race - all running Tulio's finest!
Airnimal Chameleon touring, Orbit Pro hack, Orbit Photon audax, Focus Mares AX tour, Peugeot Carbon sportive, Owen Blower vintage race - all running Tulio's finest!
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
foxyrider wrote:The main thing is that there is some! You know it's not enough when contact is made.
In a utopian world we can say it has to be X but who will police it? What about narrow roads? Like any regulation it's only as good as the enforcement, just look at phones, drinking, speeding.
You'd be surprised how strict speed limits are enforced. I know absolutely nobody that has never had a speeding fine. But I also know absolutely nobody thats ever had a fine for driving too close to the car in front. Tailgating really grips my ****. Why cant the average speed cameras be setup to detect tailgating? This is far more dangerous than speeding, yet traffic police will throw the book at you for 35mph in a 30, its ludicrous! Other bad driving habits are poorly enforced such as driving while under the influence or while distracted, again these are far more serious but are much less enforced. Justice in the UK is harsh on minor offenses and lenient on serious ones. How many murderers actually die in jail these days?
- tykeboy2003
- Posts: 1277
- Joined: 19 Jul 2010, 2:51pm
- Location: Swadlincote, South Derbyshire
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
Personally I'm comfortable with less space when I can see the vehicle coming towards me - I feel I can react to get out of danger, it's when they come from behind and I can't see where they are till they're almost past me that worries me.
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
Cyril Haearn wrote:Vehicles should overtake with a minimum distance, what is the rule for traffic going the other way? How much separation distance should there be?
They have no excuse for not seeing cyclists going the other way but almost none wait and / or move over in my experience, even in my leafy siburb
What is the law or HC?
I'm not aware that there are any specific requirements. IMO, speed affects that amount of space needed. Almost touchibng is okay when cyclist & motorist are both under 10 mph. A couple of metres (or more) are needed at 70 mph, and everything else falls in between.
edited to add: If there isn't room for two vehicles, going right down the middle will usually 'make' oncoming drivers wait. But be aware that that can turn into a game of chicken, and be prepared to get out of the way.
“In some ways, it is easier to be a dissident, for then one is without responsibility.”
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom
― Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom
-
- Posts: 220
- Joined: 4 Jul 2015, 10:35am
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
If "we" are talking about vehicles and Highway Code rule 163 then there are a heck of a lot of people ignoring this. To paraphrase the rule, if the obstruction is your side, you wait. Don't like so often happens just continue straight toward any oncoming vehicle.
It is somewhat distressing how many drivers seem to think this rule does not apply if the other vehicle happens to be a cyclist.
I think it is irrelevant whether it is 1.5m or 2m in the context I describe, as the Highway Code has not been adhered to.
How has this issue got anything to do with tailgating "Username" - ? I know it is dangerous, but you could always look for a relevant thread or start one yourself.
It is somewhat distressing how many drivers seem to think this rule does not apply if the other vehicle happens to be a cyclist.
I think it is irrelevant whether it is 1.5m or 2m in the context I describe, as the Highway Code has not been adhered to.
How has this issue got anything to do with tailgating "Username" - ? I know it is dangerous, but you could always look for a relevant thread or start one yourself.
-
- Posts: 36778
- Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
... Vehicles should overtake with a minimum distance, what is the rule for traffic going the other way? ...
I think there's an unwarranted assumption here because even with the imminent distribution of all those mats, there's no officially prescribed minimum overtaking distance. In short, it's pretty much the same overtaking or passing in the opposite direction: it's what a competent and careful driver thinks is ok. A falling standard.
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
BakfietsUK wrote:It is somewhat distressing how many drivers seem to think this rule does not apply if the other vehicle happens to be a cyclist.
I don't think drivers regard cyclists as vehicles, more like ants at a picnic.
Have we got time for another cuppa?
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
I know absolutely nobody that has never had a speeding fine]
I must be in a well behaved minority then
if the obstruction is your side, you wait. Don't like so often happens just continue straight toward any oncoming vehicle.
It is somewhat distressing how many drivers seem to think this rule does not apply if the other vehicle happens to be a cyclist.
Strangely enough I have recently had several drivers wait whilst I rode past an obstruction on their side of the road. Needless to say they get a grateful wave.
-
- Posts: 15215
- Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
Grandad wrote:I know absolutely nobody that has never had a speeding fine]
I must be in a well behaved minority thenif the obstruction is your side, you wait. Don't like so often happens just continue straight toward any oncoming vehicle.
It is somewhat distressing how many drivers seem to think this rule does not apply if the other vehicle happens to be a cyclist.
Strangely enough I have recently had several drivers wait whilst I rode past an obstruction on their side of the road. Needless to say they get a grateful wave.
It is better not to wave to thank them for obeying the law. You might be stopped by a traffic cop for taking a hand off the bars and not being in full control. In this situation it is quite usual for the driver to move off and steer towards you before you are clear. N e v e r trust them!
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
-
- Posts: 15215
- Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
Username wrote:foxyrider wrote:The main thing is that there is some! You know it's not enough when contact is made.
In a utopian world we can say it has to be X but who will police it? What about narrow roads? Like any regulation it's only as good as the enforcement, just look at phones, drinking, speeding.
You'd be surprised how strict speed limits are enforced. I know absolutely nobody that has never had a speeding fine. But I also know absolutely nobody thats ever had a fine for driving too close to the car in front. Tailgating really grips my ****. Why cant the average speed cameras be setup to detect tailgating?
You do know someone now who has never had a speeding fine, me! Have been driving for nearly 30 years maybe 200 000 km in GB and EUR. I am very proud to report that I was once accused by the cops of going too slowly
Few murderers die in gaol because we have an enlightened regime that tries to rehabilitate them
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
-
- Posts: 15215
- Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
Vorpal wrote:Cyril Haearn wrote:Vehicles should overtake with a minimum distance, what is the rule for traffic going the other way? How much separation distance should there be?
They have no excuse for not seeing cyclists going the other way but almost none wait and / or move over in my experience, even in my leafy siburb
What is the law or HC?
I'm not aware that there are any specific requirements. IMO, speed affects that amount of space needed. Almost touchibng is okay when cyclist & motorist are both under 10 mph. A couple of metres (or more) are needed at 70 mph, and everything else falls in between.
edited to add: If there isn't room for two vehicles, going right down the middle will usually 'make' oncoming drivers wait. But be aware that that can turn into a game of chicken, and be prepared to get out of the way.
Sorry Vorpal, almost touching is not ok at 10+10=20 mph. When there is little room one should go "dead" slow, when driving I stop for cyclists
Last edited by Cyril Haearn on 1 May 2017, 7:58am, edited 1 time in total.
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
- Revolution
- Posts: 218
- Joined: 20 Feb 2013, 3:23pm
- Location: North Somerset and Bristol
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
Username wrote: I know absolutely nobody that has never had a speeding fine.
Seriously?
you are mixing with the wrong crowd.
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
Cyril Haearn wrote:Grandad wrote:[quote I know absolutely nobody that has never had a speeding fine]
I must be in a well behaved minority then
Me too (38 yrs driving) . And my wife. Though both my sisters, my parents, and my brother have had the odd speeding ticket.
Re: Passing distance 1.5 or 2 m, opposing traffic
tykeboy2003 wrote:Personally I'm comfortable with less space when I can see the vehicle coming towards me - I feel I can react to get out of danger, it's when they come from behind and I can't see where they are till they're almost past me that worries me.
This. Absolutely spot-on. The head-on approach I can see and react to if necessary; the pass from behind I can't tell whether it's safe, frightening or life-ending until it's happened.