That CUK is using numbers in this way just makes a mockery of what the main aspects are of the organisation, it's also completely bonkers to virtually pigeonhole people as 'not average' by coming up with the numbers they have, so now we have people thinking, oh right, I'm not even average, I'm not qualified/fast enough to be part of this, it's utterly contemptable and stupid without any thought as to how this impacts on people just out to ride a bicycle whether that's 600 yds to the shop for a paper and some woodbines or in any other scenario.
it's verging on exculsion, probably likely to put people off by definition of you not fitting the 'average' notional speed, whether that's a stop start average or actual top speed at any given point.
It just holds negative connatations.
I also noticed that the email that was sent to me by CUK re the magazine had every single person who was on a bike wearing a helmet in the photographs that were used. Yet more insidious creep!
