Vorpal wrote:Halal slaughter, on the other hand, follows strict rules, and if performed correctly is a swift end for the animal, with relatively little stress.
I've always been against this, also you say if performed correctly, sorry animals if you get the incompotent executioner. No religion should dictate the slaughter of animals. If we choose to kill animals in a "humane" manner which is how it should be if the market demands the product. Then we should not be allowing, simply for political correctness, religions to kill by the medieval thinking. Our own methods aren't particularly far thinking either.
Why don't we not herd the animals into a large barn environment, as used to, with food to munch on, then simply reduce the oxygen content over 10 minutes or more to near zero. If this was done to us we'd experience euphoria then unconsciousness and death. Not an unpleasant way to go. A large hypobaric chamber i think? No blood, no animal cries, all processing could be done away from this.
If the advocates of halal think it humane then it is good enough for use on them too. I think they'd oppose that. Sadly medieval thinking has to be accepted across many areas of religion for pc reasons, can't offend anyone. Religion has no place in determining any standards in our society, it has a poor track record on many aspects from sexism to child abuse. If humans wish to progress then organised religion is at bottom of the list.
Sorry it is off topic but very important that we support animal welfare and bring more advanced methods to progress it.