Front Light for daytime

Commuting, Day rides, Audax, Incidents, etc.
Ric2013
Posts: 23
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 10:26pm

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by Ric2013 »

Now I feel bad. Because I have a dynamo hub with so little drag that I never bothered to put a switch on the lighting setup, and so I always have my lights on.
hemo
Posts: 1438
Joined: 16 Nov 2017, 5:40pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by hemo »

One of these for under £20 inc 4 x 18650 battery pack & charger, very bright with several modes.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/5000LM-XM-L- ... 0011.m1850
Cyril Haearn
Posts: 15215
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by Cyril Haearn »

old_windbag wrote:Here is a normal cyclist and a cyclist disguised as a battleship.

Image

So which would you detect coming up your inside. Perhaps something flashing would gain your attention.


Those two must be engaged immediately as cycling ambassadors, plus a cute little dog in the basket
Is that THE white house in the background?
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
old_windbag
Posts: 1869
Joined: 19 Feb 2015, 3:55pm

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by old_windbag »

Cyril Haearn wrote:Is that THE white house in the background?


Yes with a london bus going past it :) . I'm not from that neck of the woods but I would say that it is the front of st pauls cathedral, which donald trump most definitely doesn't reside in :wink: .
busb
Posts: 196
Joined: 28 Sep 2017, 10:10am
Location: Berks, UK

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by busb »

rmurphy195 wrote:
old_windbag wrote: There's a lot more going on than just "I'm a cyclist they should be looking for me".


That's why when I'm on the bike I don't pass anything on the left that's just starting to move, and at traffic lights I usually stop behind the first car in line if its indicators are going (unless there's an advance stop line) - because at some point during the manouevre the driver will be looking away from me - he/she HAS to.
So wizzing up the inside of a vehicle at lights just as they change is bound to cause problems. And a flashing light (that doesn't dazzle) can attract that little bit of attention in a person's peripheral vision.

Yup - I do the same - stop behind the leading vehicle who may or not be turning left - the driver you are adjacent or in front of has a greater chance of seeing me.
As for daylight use of bikes lights - I've previously used them in poor light to be seen. My new front light has a so-called daylight mode that's a slow double pulse. Both commutes are currently in the dark where I use a pulsed continuous mode where the continuous part is probably 100lm & the short pulse about 800lm every second - good for well-lit roads.
I was waiting to turn right at a T junction some years back when a van coming towards me from the left missed me by mms as he/she turned across me. I was rather taken aback but did wonder if my flashing front light was off at a critical moment. I maintain that no bike light should be off completely until switched off!
Most of the other cyclists I see in Reading not only do not use daylight lights but none whatsoever at night as well. As for traffic lights...
busb
Posts: 196
Joined: 28 Sep 2017, 10:10am
Location: Berks, UK

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by busb »

hemo wrote:One of these for under £20 inc 4 x 18650 battery pack & charger, very bright with several modes.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/5000LM-XM-L- ... 0011.m1850


If there's one law regarding cycle lights I'd happily see introduced is a ban on elastic band mounting or "tool-less" installation as it's marketed as. I rarely get dazzled by motor vehicles but do by other cyclists with their +500lm wide-beam lights NOT pointing downwards - either because they are set badly or move every time they go over a bump hence replacing mine with one that clamps
I realise that cyclist's lights need to compete in brightness to some extent to motor vehicles (that have to include regular tests including headlight adjustment) - cycle lights can be 10000lm or higher with no regulation over the angle they point at or the shape of the beam.
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 19801
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by [XAP]Bob »

Frankly I'd rather see tighter restrictions on motor vehicle headlamps to start with. They are generally horribly bright and dazzling... That is even from my driving position high up in an MPV.

The adjustment of beam angle needs to be a lot tighter, and needs to be automatic - the number of people who have their 'dipped beam' set well above the horizon is absurd.
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
Cyril Haearn
Posts: 15215
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by Cyril Haearn »

[XAP]Bob wrote:Frankly I'd rather see tighter restrictions on motor vehicle headlamps to start with. They are generally horribly bright and dazzling... That is even from my driving position high up in an MPV.

The adjustment of beam angle needs to be a lot tighter, and needs to be automatic - the number of people who have their 'dipped beam' set well above the horizon is absurd.


So one often sees standing vehicles with lights on even when the engine is not running :(
Last edited by Cyril Haearn on 3 Jan 2018, 10:10am, edited 2 times in total.
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
hemo
Posts: 1438
Joined: 16 Nov 2017, 5:40pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by hemo »

busb wrote:
hemo wrote:One of these for under £20 inc 4 x 18650 battery pack & charger, very bright with several modes.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/5000LM-XM-L- ... 0011.m1850


If there's one law regarding cycle lights I'd happily see introduced is a ban on elastic band mounting or "tool-less" installation as it's marketed as. I rarely get dazzled by motor vehicles but do by other cyclists with their +500lm wide-beam lights NOT pointing downwards - either because they are set badly or move every time they go over a bump hence replacing mine with one that clamps
I realise that cyclist's lights need to compete in brightness to some extent to motor vehicles (that have to include regular tests including headlight adjustment) - cycle lights can be 10000lm or higher with no regulation over the angle they point at or the shape of the beam.



The fact that they have several light modes dosen't mean you have to use the high setting, outer bezzle strobe is the one I use most. In all not much differnt to the Lezyne's from reputable retailers which are also bright and use elastic rubber fittings, just a bit cheaper with longer battery life with 18650 cells.

As a car/lgv driver as well I prefer cycles to have any light showing rather then most I tend to see that have nothing at all albeit a cheap crappy light that only omits a glimpse of light once you get within a fe yards.
User avatar
squeaker
Posts: 4114
Joined: 12 Jan 2007, 11:43pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by squeaker »

[XAP]Bob wrote:Frankly I'd rather see tighter restrictions on motor vehicle headlamps to start with. They are generally horribly bright and dazzling...
In that there are far more of them, and the regulations seem way behind the technology (especially in relation to the wavelengths that are used / allowed to scatter) then I have to agree with you (as a motor vehicle driver). The misused 'torch' problem is more of an issue on dark cycleways or quiet country lanes IME :evil:
"42"
thirdcrank
Posts: 36781
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by thirdcrank »

Cyril Haearn wrote: ... So one often sees standing vehicles with lights on even when the engine is not running :(


It used to be an offence to have headlights lit on a stationary vehicle, other than an enforced stoppage, which I take to mean when held up while driving. I can't find any mention of it in either the HC or the lighting regs so I presume it's been scrapped. AFAIK, it was a hangover from wartime blackout regs. Even if it is still an offence, which I doubt, nobody is going to enforce it. It looks as though it's been replaced by the general ban on dazzling other road users, which isn't enforced either. :roll:

Most, if not all, modern cars seem to have the feature which automatically switches on the headlights for a short period when it's locked. It was on my 52 reg Berlingo, so it's neither recent nor restricted to luxury models :lol: but it would contravene a ban on headlights when parked.

Bearing in mind the amount of this sort of gimmickry in vehicle lighting, automatic levelling can't be such a big deal and so much better than a wheel out of sight down by the driver's knees that has to be adjusted eg whenever passengers get in or out of the back seats.

Over the recent Crimbo break, I've done several Dad's Taxi airport runs at times when I'm now normally in bed. There seems to be an impressive number of cycling commuters in Leeds if yesterday morning is typical, but without any counting of examples, the number of riders with absurdly bright flashing front lamps - generally without any cut-off beam - outnumbered by far the drivers with dazzling headlamps. (As an aside, lycra shorts + bare knees in early January seems to indicate a certain lack of experience, but with the car heater toasting my knees, it's not my opinion that counts :oops: ) I fancy undipped automatic headlights on motor vehicles are a much greater problem for cyclists on roads with less traffic, since they only seem to dip automatically for other motor vehicles.

By far the worst case of dazzling I experienced was returning on the M62 from Doncaster Airport just befor Crimbo when I came up behind a big truck with two very bright flashing amber LED arrays at eye-level about a yard apart. It was only when I was on the point of overtaking it that I realised that it was a wide load without any of the lights or marker boards required at the outer extremities. Nobody seems to be enforcing that, either.
Cyril Haearn
Posts: 15215
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by Cyril Haearn »

My chance to use a new phrase I just nicked from Brucey, +2

Leeds is full of *various flavours of urban hipster* on their fixies
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
User avatar
mjr
Posts: 20337
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by mjr »

hemo wrote:The fact that they have several light modes dosen't mean you have to use the high setting, outer bezzle strobe is the one I use most.

If that's an actual strobe, it's illegal and anti-social. Please stop it. Flash between 1 and 4 times a second if you have any dignity.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 19801
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by [XAP]Bob »

mjr wrote:
hemo wrote:The fact that they have several light modes dosen't mean you have to use the high setting, outer bezzle strobe is the one I use most.

If that's an actual strobe, it's illegal and anti-social. Please stop it. Flash between 1 and 4 times a second if you have any dignity.



Why is 1-4Hz not a strobe?
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
User avatar
squeaker
Posts: 4114
Joined: 12 Jan 2007, 11:43pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Front Light for daytime

Post by squeaker »

thirdcrank wrote:Nobody seems to be enforcing that, either.
Applies to most of the rules in the Highway Code nowadays :roll: :( :evil:
"42"
Post Reply