Should you have lights on during the day?

Commuting, Day rides, Audax, Incidents, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 19801
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by [XAP]Bob »

As has been said repeatedly - there is actually no evidence to support your assumption that a yellow top is less like to be subject to saccadic masking or cbdr or any other failure to observe.

People are not invisible, even when wearing a suit.
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
pwa
Posts: 17408
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by pwa »

[XAP]Bob wrote:As has been said repeatedly - there is actually no evidence to support your assumption that a yellow top is less like to be subject to saccadic masking or cbdr or any other failure to observe.

People are not invisible, even when wearing a suit.


Not invisible, but less noticeable. Just going off the evidence of my own eyes, Bob.
tatanab
Posts: 5038
Joined: 8 Feb 2007, 12:37pm

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by tatanab »

[XAP]Bob wrote:As has been said repeatedly - there is actually no evidence to support your assumption that a yellow top is less like to be subject to saccadic masking or cbdr or any other failure to observe.
True. My club colours are yellow with a bit of red. It does not stop people failing to spot me. On one occassion I was wearing my great big old yellow cycling cape, like a great yellow pimple coming down the road; it did not stop the POLICE driver from pulling out on me.

Ok, that's 3 incidents in about 7 years so hardly regular.
pwa
Posts: 17408
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by pwa »

tatanab wrote:
[XAP]Bob wrote:As has been said repeatedly - there is actually no evidence to support your assumption that a yellow top is less like to be subject to saccadic masking or cbdr or any other failure to observe.
True. My club colours are yellow with a bit of red. It does not stop people failing to spot me. On one occassion I was wearing my great big old yellow cycling cape, like a great yellow pimple coming down the road; it did not stop the POLICE driver from pulling out on me.

Ok, that's 3 incidents in about 7 years so hardly regular.


I know that nothing you wear, or any lighting, will stop all numpty drivers doing their worst. It's just a matter of tilting the odds more in your favour.
AlaninWales
Posts: 1626
Joined: 26 Oct 2012, 1:47pm

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by AlaninWales »

pwa wrote:
tatanab wrote:
[XAP]Bob wrote:As has been said repeatedly - there is actually no evidence to support your assumption that a yellow top is less like to be subject to saccadic masking or cbdr or any other failure to observe.
True. My club colours are yellow with a bit of red. It does not stop people failing to spot me. On one occassion I was wearing my great big old yellow cycling cape, like a great yellow pimple coming down the road; it did not stop the POLICE driver from pulling out on me.

Ok, that's 3 incidents in about 7 years so hardly regular.


I know that nothing you wear, or any lighting, will stop all numpty drivers doing their worst. It's just a matter of tilting the odds more in your favour.

But there is no evidence that it does so. You believe it should, but the evidence does not support that belief.
pwa
Posts: 17408
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by pwa »

AlaninWales wrote:
pwa wrote:
tatanab wrote:True. My club colours are yellow with a bit of red. It does not stop people failing to spot me. On one occassion I was wearing my great big old yellow cycling cape, like a great yellow pimple coming down the road; it did not stop the POLICE driver from pulling out on me.

Ok, that's 3 incidents in about 7 years so hardly regular.


I know that nothing you wear, or any lighting, will stop all numpty drivers doing their worst. It's just a matter of tilting the odds more in your favour.

But there is no evidence that it does so. You believe it should, but the evidence does not support that belief.


The only reliable evidence I have is that of my eyes. I have seen analysis of data obtained from road accidents, and that only leaves more questions than answers. So I carry on using what seems best from my own experience.
Bez
Posts: 1218
Joined: 10 Feb 2015, 10:41am
Contact:

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by Bez »

pwa wrote:If anyone is using daytime lights but not using bright clothing, I suspect you may be miscalculating. From a driver's perspective I think a bright yellow top catches my attention better than a front light in daytime and good light.


From my perspective as a driver I find lights much more effective than coloured clothes.

There are a number of scenarios where, IME, clothing fails but lighting still works. One is when clothing blends in: I have a number of times seen green or even yellow "hi-vis" tops blend in with surrounding foliage. Another is one of the most challenging situations for a driver in terms of visibility, which is going in and out of tree cover in bright sunlight: the effect of the lighting change combined with the glare on the windscreen renders anything in the shadows very difficult to see. IME clothing makes no difference here whereas lights do. Similarly in mist, clothing doesn't make a large difference to conspicuity but decent lights do.

This is all quite aside from the moral or systemic benefits or drawbacks of lighting; the above remarks are purely pragmatic (and largely relate primarily to rural rather than urban environments).
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 19801
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by [XAP]Bob »

Excellent word:
conspicuity
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
Cyril Haearn
Posts: 15215
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: Slhould you have lights on during the day?

Post by Cyril Haearn »

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
(Archaeologists saying)
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
User avatar
mjr
Posts: 20333
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by mjr »

AlaninWales wrote:
pwa wrote:I know that nothing you wear, or any lighting, will stop all numpty drivers doing their worst. It's just a matter of tilting the odds more in your favour.

But there is no evidence that it does so. You believe it should, but the evidence does not support that belief.

Worse, there's evidence that it does not, and theories about the possible reasons why.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
Bez
Posts: 1218
Joined: 10 Feb 2015, 10:41am
Contact:

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by Bez »

mjr wrote:there's evidence that it does not


Go on then :)
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 19801
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: Slhould you have lights on during the day?

Post by [XAP]Bob »

Cyril Haearn wrote:Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
(Archaeologists saying)


Unless said evidence *ought* to be visible.

The absence of evidence for a second moon sized satellite of the earth is indeed evidence of absence - because we would expect to see such evidence.


There is no evidence for a massive steel spike in the centre of Stonehenge. That is actually evidence of absence, because we would expect to see it.


We ought to see that those wearing yellow are significantly underrepresented in accident statistics, and we don't - that is evidence that the wearing of yellow doesn't actually make a difference in the real world.

https://waronthemotorist.wordpress.com/ ... the-roads/
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
User avatar
RickH
Posts: 5839
Joined: 5 Mar 2012, 6:39pm
Location: Horwich, Lancs.

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by RickH »

pwa wrote:I know that nothing you wear, or any lighting, will stop all numpty drivers doing their worst.

Although wearing nothing might get people's attention! :shock:
Former member of the Cult of the Polystyrene Head Carbuncle.
User avatar
The utility cyclist
Posts: 3607
Joined: 22 Aug 2016, 12:28pm
Location: The first garden city

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by The utility cyclist »

Daytime Lights, hi-vis noddy hat and this is your average every day occurrence :twisted:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 1612071403
User avatar
Cunobelin
Posts: 10801
Joined: 6 Feb 2007, 7:22pm

Re: Should you have lights on during the day?

Post by Cunobelin »

[XAP]Bob wrote:As has been said repeatedly - there is actually no evidence to support your assumption that a yellow top is less like to be subject to saccadic masking or cbdr or any other failure to observe.

People are not invisible, even when wearing a suit.



I remember an experiment reported in the cycling press during the 70's

Guy tried cycling the same route at the same time each day wearing different clothing, then recorded close passes and other incidents

Apparently the safest outfit was a dark suit with silver buttons sewn on the shoulders and a toy policeman helmet!
Post Reply