Two metre rule

Commuting, Day rides, Audax, Incidents, etc.
peetee
Posts: 3025
Joined: 4 May 2010, 10:20pm
Location: Cornwall

Two metre rule

Post by peetee »

It is becoming obvious to me that the local council is not taking advantage of the current situation. They continue to trim verges and ignore dangerous potholes. On the coast road near me there is a stretch of road running steeply downhill where the surface is in a terrible state (yes it has been reported). Intermittent tree cover makes it very difficult to spot but It has been ignored for weeks. As the road continues uphill, potholes there have been marked for repair. It is not difficult to work out which represent the greater danger to cyclists.
Everyone in the nation is now used to a slower pace of life which includes keeping a distance from unrelated individuals. Given the continued poor state of the roads and the difficulty of making swerve-free progress on a bicycle perhaps CyclingUK and other organisations should be taking advantage of the high profile of the 2m rule and putting that forward for vehicles passing cyclists? After all, why should the welfare of a stranger in a queue be of more value than a stranger on a bike?
Last edited by peetee on 27 May 2020, 11:51am, edited 2 times in total.
fastpedaller
Posts: 2936
Joined: 10 Jul 2014, 1:12pm
Location: Norfolk

Re: Two metre rule

Post by fastpedaller »

Re the potholes.... I've recently reported some (via fillthathole) and put the comment "now's an ideal time for you to fix these defects whilst the weather is favourable and there is very little traffic"
Peter F
Posts: 143
Joined: 25 May 2020, 8:16am

Re: Two metre rule

Post by Peter F »

The roads are in a poor state in places near me, but let's be honest, I very much doubt there is going to be a lot of funding for this sort of thing now and in the near future. Not given the damage to the economy and the cost of the furlough scheme.
philvantwo
Posts: 1390
Joined: 8 Dec 2012, 6:08pm

Re: Two metre rule

Post by philvantwo »

Here in south staffs some roads are in a bad state and now the council want £46 to empty your green bin once a fortnight. Meanwhile the CEO of the council is on a disgusting salary of £210,000.
User avatar
gaz
Posts: 14229
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 12:09pm
Location: Kent, lorry park of England

Re: Two metre rule

Post by gaz »

My experience remains that once a person sits in the driving seat of their metal box, concern for anybody outside the metal box most often goes out the (probably open) window.

If you aren't in the car with them they've already ticked the distancing box (even with windows open or the top down).

If you need them to slow down so you can move further into the lane to give space to pedestrians on the pavement you can forget it. You and the pedestrian chose not to be in a distancing box and therefore deserve whatever's coming, be that risk of contamination or a high speed collision :evil: .
Missing, presumed fed.
User avatar
foxyrider
Posts: 5360
Joined: 29 Aug 2011, 10:25am
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire

Re: Two metre rule

Post by foxyrider »

and of course there is talk of reducing the 2m rule to fall in line with WHO guidance to allow people to actually return to work in situations that are not a huge shed or open office area.
Convention? what's that then?
Airnimal Chameleon touring, Orbit Pro hack, Orbit Photon audax, Focus Mares AX tour, Peugeot Carbon sportive, Owen Blower vintage race - all running Tulio's finest!
mattsccm
Posts: 3847
Joined: 28 Nov 2009, 9:44pm

Re: Two metre rule

Post by mattsccm »

Dream on. It's not a priority for most people.
Marcus Aurelius
Posts: 1759
Joined: 1 Feb 2018, 10:20am

Re: Two metre rule

Post by Marcus Aurelius »

foxyrider wrote:and of course there is talk of reducing the 2m rule to fall in line with WHO guidance to allow people to actually return to work in situations that are not a huge shed or open office area.

The ‘2 meter rule’ has been a real bug bear of mine from the outset. That figure was plucked out of the air, seemingly totally at random. The WHO guidance has always been for 1 meter separation, which would make a lot of things easier at present.
Peter F
Posts: 143
Joined: 25 May 2020, 8:16am

Re: Two metre rule

Post by Peter F »

Marcus Aurelius wrote:
foxyrider wrote:and of course there is talk of reducing the 2m rule to fall in line with WHO guidance to allow people to actually return to work in situations that are not a huge shed or open office area.

The ‘2 meter rule’ has been a real bug bear of mine from the outset. That figure was plucked out of the air, seemingly totally at random. The WHO guidance has always been for 1 meter separation, which would make a lot of things easier at present.

It wasn't plucked out of the air.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52522460
pwa
Posts: 13993
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: Two metre rule

Post by pwa »

Marcus Aurelius wrote:
foxyrider wrote:and of course there is talk of reducing the 2m rule to fall in line with WHO guidance to allow people to actually return to work in situations that are not a huge shed or open office area.

The ‘2 meter rule’ has been a real bug bear of mine from the outset. That figure was plucked out of the air, seemingly totally at random. The WHO guidance has always been for 1 meter separation, which would make a lot of things easier at present.

I would also add to that the fact that outdoors, and where people are simply passing and not spending much time together, being close to someone is generally seen as being less risky than it is indoors and when people are close for protracted periods.
Marcus Aurelius
Posts: 1759
Joined: 1 Feb 2018, 10:20am

Re: Two metre rule

Post by Marcus Aurelius »

pwa wrote:I would also add to that the fact that outdoors, and where people are simply passing and not spending much time together, being close to someone is generally seen as being less risky than it is indoors and when people are close for protracted periods.

That’s quite right
peetee
Posts: 3025
Joined: 4 May 2010, 10:20pm
Location: Cornwall

Re: Two metre rule

Post by peetee »

peetee wrote: organisations should be taking advantage of the high profile of the 2m rule and putting that forward for vehicles passing cyclists? After all, why should the welfare of a stranger in a queue be of more value than a stranger on a bike?


I would welcome comments on this particular point. Perhaps campaign along the lines of “2m. You give it in a queue so give it on the road too.”
Cyril Haearn
Posts: 15199
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: Two metre rule

Post by Cyril Haearn »

More than 2m where possible
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 18314
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: Two metre rule

Post by [XAP]Bob »

Downhill and uphill are relative to direction of travel surely (of course a one way road only has one permissible direction of travel)
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
peetee
Posts: 3025
Joined: 4 May 2010, 10:20pm
Location: Cornwall

Re: Two metre rule

Post by peetee »

[XAP]Bob wrote:Downhill and uphill are relative to direction of travel surely (of course a one way road only has one permissible direction of travel)



Sorry, you’ve lost me.
Post Reply