Mike Sales wrote:PDQ Mobile wrote:Illegal because the ridden bike does not have two functioning brakes?
And on the one being ridden only one can be used.
Yes, was my meaning.
And there's extra weight to stop too.
Mike Sales wrote:PDQ Mobile wrote:Illegal because the ridden bike does not have two functioning brakes?
And on the one being ridden only one can be used.
[XAP]Bob wrote:Mike Sales wrote:PDQ Mobile wrote:Illegal because the ridden bike does not have two functioning brakes?
And on the one being ridden only one can be used.
The law says nothing about being able to use the brakes, only that they must be functional.
PDQ Mobile wrote:Mike Sales wrote:PDQ Mobile wrote:Illegal because the ridden bike does not have two functioning brakes?
And on the one being ridden only one can be used.
Yes, was my meaning.
And there's extra weight to stop too.
thirdcrank wrote:The regs require the fitting of certain brakes. They say nothing about the rider being able to use them.
Imagine somebody riding "no hands." They wouldn't be charged with riding a pedal cycle not fitted with brakes.
PDQ Mobile wrote: ... But riding without "due care and attention" ...
Mike Sales wrote:PDQ Mobile wrote:Illegal because the ridden bike does not have two functioning brakes?
And on the one being ridden only one can be used.
simonineaston wrote:I remember an episode involving my blue VW beetle, my mate's Honda 750 VF and some climbing rope...
simonineaston wrote:I remember an episode involving my blue VW beetle, my mate's Honda 750 VF and some climbing rope...