Toucan cyclist detectors?

Commuting, Day rides, Audax, Incidents, etc.
mikeymo
Posts: 1667
Joined: 27 Sep 2016, 6:23pm

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby mikeymo » 15 Nov 2020, 9:42pm

thirdcrank wrote:Good luck with your investigation. (I'll pass, on the site visit.)

It's stating the obvious to suggest that somebody at Leeds Cycling Campaign may know the answer to your query.

http://www.leedscyclingcampaign.co.uk/

From looking at streetview, I see the arrangement until recently was a a white line down the middle of the approach paths and CYCLISTS DISMOUNT signs (the highwaymen's tacit admission of incompetence) all around the crossing. There must be somebody at Leeds City Council who knows. One mistake I made was to accept the invitation to a consultation meeting. Don't assume that anybody involved with cycling had any input, but it does look like an improvement as against CYCLISTS DISMOUNT.

Another possibility is Cllr John Illingworth. He represents Kirkstall but lives in Cookridge. Twenty years ago he was active in the promotion of cycling and knew the score. I've had no contact with him for quite some time.

https://democracy.leeds.gov.uk/mgUserInfo.aspx?UID=192


Yes, good ideas, thanks.

Ellieb
Posts: 887
Joined: 26 Jul 2008, 7:06pm

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby Ellieb » 15 Nov 2020, 10:35pm

Hmm. I am still a bit (easily) confused. You are at a Toucan crossing which has the signals: red man, green man & green bike (but no red bike). If the red man is showing, is it legal to ride a bike across?

tim-b
Posts: 1638
Joined: 10 Oct 2009, 8:20am

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby tim-b » 16 Nov 2020, 6:28am

Hi
Read the "Wording of the Highway Code" ( Highway Code gov link )
Compare Highway Code rules 80 and 81 ( Highway Code gov link )
Rule 80 has neither a "must / must not" nor a link to law and is therefore advisory, whether it's advisable to cross against red is down to your good judgement
Regards
tim-b
~~~~¯\(ツ)/¯~~~~

Cyril Haearn
Posts: 14543
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am
Location: Leafy suburbia

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby Cyril Haearn » 16 Nov 2020, 7:15am

Might be best to wait for green to avoid the risk of being dealt with by a PSO who does not know the law
Entertainer, intellectual, idealist, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies

mikeymo
Posts: 1667
Joined: 27 Sep 2016, 6:23pm

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby mikeymo » 16 Nov 2020, 8:02am

Cyril Haearn wrote:Might be best to wait for green to avoid the risk of being dealt with by a PSO who does not know the law


What is a PSO?

thirdcrank
Posts: 30025
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby thirdcrank » 16 Nov 2020, 8:49am

I see that among other things, PSO = protected species observer. Cyclists are not a protected species in Leeds so you should be OK, although I don't know the act and section

Cyril Haearn
Posts: 14543
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am
Location: Leafy suburbia

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby Cyril Haearn » 16 Nov 2020, 9:09am

PSO, PSP
Police-shaped object, could be a real Constable or a PCSO or a sheriff employed by a shopping centre, the city, etc etc
Entertainer, intellectual, idealist, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies

User avatar
mjr
Posts: 16363
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby mjr » 16 Nov 2020, 4:12pm

basingstoke123 wrote:[...] Interestingly, every other person (cyclist/pedestrian) I saw, crossed on red! This rather defeats the purpose of the lights.

The request push buttons were also redundant, and serve no purpose, except in testing your patience!

The request push buttons do serve a purpose: it increases the amount of time that people will wait for a badly-timed crossing. Apparently to almost half in your example!
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.

User avatar
mjr
Posts: 16363
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby mjr » 16 Nov 2020, 4:13pm

Cyril Haearn wrote:Might be best to wait for green to avoid the risk of being dealt with by [police] who does not know the law

Any police officer with the power to deal with this should probably be challenged and provoked into checking the actual law before they get a more serious law wrong - so it is your civic duty to assist with police education by crossing on the red man when possible!
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.

Cyril Haearn
Posts: 14543
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am
Location: Leafy suburbia

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby Cyril Haearn » 16 Nov 2020, 4:14pm

Indeed, I like arguing, but what if Sargent Constable is in a bad mood? Besides, the cops do much more than just traffic, they have to learn lots of complicated laws, not sure I could do that, tomorrow they might be dealing with football hooligans etc &c
..
It is all far too complicated, the coloured lights and buttons, with the intention of 'saving' mortons a few seconds, - 1!
Entertainer, intellectual, idealist, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies

mikeymo
Posts: 1667
Joined: 27 Sep 2016, 6:23pm

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby mikeymo » 16 Nov 2020, 6:06pm

Cyril Haearn wrote:...they have to learn lots of complicated laws, not sure I could do that...


I'm sure you could. After all, you're an intellectual, and you've demonstrated your appreciation for the precise use of languages, ancient and modern, many times in your posts.

User avatar
mjr
Posts: 16363
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby mjr » 16 Nov 2020, 6:10pm

Cyril Haearn wrote:Indeed, I like arguing, but what if Sargent Constable is in a bad mood?

I suspect they'd try to provoke you into swearing at them or taking a swing at them and then deal with you as a public order offence, rather than persist with a traffic offence where they've got the law wrong. ;)

Besides, the cops do much more than just traffic, they have to learn lots of complicated laws, not sure I could do that, tomorrow they might be dealing with football hooligans etc &c

I'm sure it's a very difficult job but that doesn't mean they should discourage good things by doing it wrong.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.

Stevek76
Posts: 536
Joined: 28 Jul 2015, 11:23am

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby Stevek76 » 16 Nov 2020, 10:31pm

kylecycler wrote: in fact AFAIK a Toucan is just a Puffin with entitlement for cyclists as well as pedestrians, at least without dismounting, which they are required to do for the other types of crossing


It's a common misconception but certainly for zebras there is no requirement to dismount providing both sides are shared use/cycle paths, however you do not have as much legal protection when crossing mounted vs dismounted. I'm reasonably sure this applies to puffins/pelicans also where they haven't been swapped out for toucans. Ultimately you're allowed to cycle on the road and you're allowed to cycle on a shared use pavement so there's nothing inherent in the crossing that actually means you have to get off.

mikeymo wrote:I wonder, are there any Toucan crossings where the red bicycle appears later than the red pedestrian?


Nope.

Pete Owens
Posts: 1901
Joined: 7 Jul 2008, 12:52am

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby Pete Owens » 17 Nov 2020, 1:17am

Stevek76 wrote:It's a common misconception but certainly for zebras there is no requirement to dismount providing both sides are shared use/cycle paths, however you do not have as much legal protection when crossing mounted vs dismounted. I'm reasonably sure this applies to puffins/pelicans also where they haven't been swapped out for toucans. Ultimately you're allowed to cycle on the road and you're allowed to cycle on a shared use pavement so there's nothing inherent in the crossing that actually means you have to get off.

So long as there are no pedestrians using the zebra crossing at the time - in which case vehicles (and that includes bicycles) are not allowed to use that particular part of the road. And since the zebra doesn't accord priority to cyclists in the same way it does to pedestrians then drivers do not have to stop for you until you get off and become a pedestrian.

The same applies to puffin/pelican crossings - the only time you can legally ride on the crossing is when the red man is displayed.

tim-b
Posts: 1638
Joined: 10 Oct 2009, 8:20am

Re: Toucan cyclist detectors?

Postby tim-b » 17 Nov 2020, 6:18am

Hi
And finally...trivia round
What do pelican, puffin and toucan stand for? (they are loose acronyms BTW)

No takers?
Pelican Crossing-1960s public information film link (with acronym)
Puffin: Pedestrian User-Friendly INtelligent crossing
Toucan: Two Can cross (we probably all knew that one)
Regards
tim-b
~~~~¯\(ツ)/¯~~~~