Jdsk wrote:mikeymo wrote:Jdsk wrote:How about discussing boxers... I read what you said as asserting that there are flat sixes in production Porsche 911s that aren't boxers. Is that what you are saying?
Who, and where?
When you said "I'm sure you're right" in response to "The Porsche 911 lineage has a flat 6, but isn't a Boxer" above.
Mmmm. I suppose the written word doesn't really work in this context. In speech, with the inflection that could be added, the meaning would have been better. I humbly apologise.
The word that I should have added was "not". As in "I'm not sure you're right". Followed by the linked web pages that seem to say the Porsche Flat 6 engines are indeed "Boxer" engines.
Why did I feel the need to be "ironic"? Or perhaps hope that people would read my linked pages and see the difference?