Psamathe wrote:Mine is just a small "bell" with a plastic sprung hammer you pull back and ping, not something I regard as "harsh".
I think cheap pingers are among the harshest noises.
It may be that rural lanes and towns differ because many of those who used to be startled were on deserted lanes alone and probably "miles away" in their mind expecting nobody, looking out for wildlife rather than traffic.
Rural lanes are far from deserted nowadays. The middle of Winchester even less so. Maybe shouting hello is OK on a deserted lane (especially if you are far enough away to avoid a swung stick...), but that is very much an exceptional use of an audible alert.
DevonDamo wrote:Why are you threatening to hit a fellow cyclist with a stick for their choice of giving a verbal warning?
My comment was a warning, not a threat. If someone is startling people with bell or voice, I suspect they are leaving the "warning" too late to the point of it being audible assault ("causes a reasonable apprehension of harm") and some people will react instinctively to defend themselves.
As discussed previously, I feel that a bell carries over traffic noise and hubbub far better than a voice, so it's far more likely that a verbal warning loud enough to startle has been delivered from too close.
Keyboard gangsterism is embarrassing at the best of times, but when it's done amongst regulars on a cycling forum, it's right up there with a religious Youth Group doing a bad-boy rap.