And I merely pointed out that the only legal record of rights of way is the definitive map and statement, with the map carrying greater weight.mjr wrote: ↑16 Oct 2021, 3:02pmOSM use our own surveys, traces of satellite imagery and, where made available, data dumps from the definitive map keepers. Someone (Ian maybe?) posted a link to a list of data sources earlier in this discussion.
I only said OS was currently more reliable on legal status, not that it was perfect or authoritative. There always seems to be someone on this site wanting to argue with anything
OSM is better on surface types, barriers and non-Sustrans cycle routes, which matter more to me.
Route 74 has gone
Re: Route 74 has gone
Re: Route 74 has gone
Indeed. Good luck loading that onto your sat nav or phone. For most people, OSM and even OS are more practical choices.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.