you state there have been experiments but a computer model is not an experiment when it is 95% inaccurate.https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/88 ... -indonesia
yes I know its the express, but it has nothing to do with niburu causing princess dianas death.
so we now have NASA claiming that the Bali volcano will stop global warming for 5 years. convenient that is considering it stopped in 1998. but it fails to match the IPCC scientific view that the increased CO2 it is producing means they have to claim that warming will continue while the ash cloud and SO2 will block solar radiation causing cooling. every year it gets colder and every year we are told it has broken all climate records when the evidence is to the contrary. the IPCC makes no allowance for anything else it has to be blamed on CO2 and man made CO2 at that. Nothing else will do it is in the IPCC mission statement.
the problem was never the IPCC reports, the leaked pre doctored copies show that there was never a problem with the original data sets, the problem is the politically written summary for policy makers which contradicts the data so badly they have to rewrite the reports to fit the summary. science is now based on those flawed data sets so billions is being wasted desperately searching for a tropospheric hot spot that will never come.
the clue is in the title intergovernmental panel on climate change - it is not a global scientific panel on climate change. 35000 accredited PHDs in climate science petitioned against an inconvenient truth. the IPCC relies on less than 250 phds and a handfull of friends of the earth pamphlets to tell the developed world that it wants to charge them 3 trillion a year in extra taxes because they cannot think of another way of wealth redistrubution. the science is far from settled despite the constant ever desperate daily press on the subject trying to counter the bleeding obvious going on outside the window. you cannot claim to predict the future based on incomplete and biased data. the climate is chaos theory writ large with thousands of inputs that never get factored into the climate models I used to run a climate model using one of those process sharing programs that uses millions of PCs to simulate a super computer similar tot he SETI program. I ran it for years on a spare machine and produced around 80gb of program data. it's aim was to forecast global temps for 2050, Casino 21 I think it was called. Casino being the right word for it. still it was fun to watch. http://www.phase-trans.msm.cam.ac.uk/20 ... sics01.ppt
a nice scary pile of propaganda.
I watched a channel 4 documentary a while back about the earths natural history (something hosted by baldrick) and every episode had to claim that CO2 caused massive global warming killing everything off when that just has not been proven. just like every business announcement from the BBC bases everything on Brexit or 16 years ago when every news broadcast seemed to start with 'since the events of september 11' the constant cries of wolf are turning the tide against the push for global govt and they don't like it, just like they didn't like the brexit or trump votes - how dare the public have a different opinion. even worse once it has been shown the sky will not fall in ever more are going against the group think political grain.
the constant virtue signalling from the so called greens who are destroying everything they touch is laughable - they get an idea into their heads that works on a small scale like biofuels or renewables then go mental on it causing massive environmental damage. if they were serious then the intergovernmental green conferences would be on skype, not some resource poor sunny island in the pacific sinking under the weight of tourists and delegates after some free sunshine and snorkelling- not rising seas - NASA has destroyed that myth years ago.
Al Gore claimed Hurricane Katrina was just the start of it despite evidence to the contrary and it being the quietest decade for a hundred years, again this year claims of endless CO2 powered destruction that never happened. Every single weather event is blamed on global warming and the message is failing. They have to switch that message to pollution and soon,the earth needs cleaning up but it can't be taxed so will end up costing someone. that 300bn of climate model money could have built fleets of ships to sift the oceans and set up nursery zones to replenish damaged stocks.
man has no effect on climate and will never control it, we can only adapt to it and that is the way to go as it is far far cheaper to do. two trillion wasted so far paying for bad science, something silly like 300bn just for failed modelling. Lovelock had it right with his Gaia theory and daisy world, the earth is self regulating and man needs to stop tinkering with it. eventually it will decide to kill off 4 bn of us and we can settle back down again. of course the UN wants to see the global population down to 1bn but that's another story.
one ongoing theory is that the deep ocean currents are powered by gravitational shifts - not salinity claimed by others, they know the moon has a massive effect on how the earths climate is controlled and balanced and taking it further out many of the oscillation patterns match the earths axis wobbles and positions of the other planets in the solar system as planets line up and combine their gravities - for good reason the planetary alignments signalled possible disasters. but so as long as we keep going round the sun and the sun keeps going around the galaxy then so to will ocean currents. there is no evidence of the NAD switching off but there is an increasing understanding of oceanic decadal oscillations though not the cause or why the atlantic takes 60 years to cycle compared to half that in the pacific. they knew these varying currents effected polar ice thickness and weather patterns yet were still happy to blame it on man made CO2 as nature allowed them to push a false agenda, now they admit that there is a geothermal hotspot under the antarctic melting the ice while the antarctic itself has never been colder.
The biggest threat to mankind and nature is from space. a fraction of the money wasted on faux science could and should have set up a permanent near earth object detection system as we are long overdue a big hit. At least the models they are using to track the space wanderers are reasonably accurate. but those are around 0.5% of what is out there.
but back to the OP - I wouldn't bother with a mask except when it is cold, it is quite easy to burn your lungs in the subzero air if you are gasping.