The War on Britain's Roads

Commuting, Day rides, Audax, Incidents, etc.
thirdcrank
Posts: 36778
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 2:44pm

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by thirdcrank »

I'll suggest that firing off emails or even formal complaints to the BBC is a sheer waste of time and it's probably counter productive in that it's an indicator of heightened audience interest. Anybody with substantial grounds for grievance can go direct to a lawyer and take the licence payers to the cleaners.

(A lot of posts since I started on this one,)
User avatar
squeaker
Posts: 4114
Joined: 12 Jan 2007, 11:43pm
Location: Sussex

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by squeaker »

Watched it this morning. IMHO, OK for the genre, apart from the crow-barred in at the end clips from the 5yr old courier 'race'.
Clearly loads of numpties out there (on all sorts of wheels): just that the one's conducting the heavier vehicles have the most potential for doing serious harm :(
Typically, the Sun's piece is a distortion - Cynthia Barlow's approach to the RMC shareholder meeting came over as measured and well researched - maybe more journalists should follow her example :roll:
"42"
User avatar
Simon L6
Posts: 1382
Joined: 4 Jan 2007, 12:43pm

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by Simon L6 »

thirdcrank wrote:I'll suggest that firing off emails or even formal complaints to the BBC is a sheer waste of time and it's probably counter productive in that it's an indicator of heightened audience interest. Anybody with substantial grounds for grievance can go direct to a lawyer and take the licence payers to the cleaners.

(A lot of posts since I started on this one,)
absolutely correct. If anybody is that interested they should read the BikeBiz article.
Geriatrix
Posts: 1855
Joined: 23 Oct 2007, 1:33pm
Location: Caterham

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by Geriatrix »

Here is further evidence that the BBC "documentary" was all about sensationalism. Only the first part of the incident was shown in the documentary. Watch the whole clip and it changes your perspective, but then the second part never suited their agenda.
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled - Richard Feynman
User avatar
al_yrpal
Posts: 11571
Joined: 25 Jul 2007, 9:47pm
Location: Think Cheddar and Cider
Contact:

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by al_yrpal »

Just watched it. What a depressing programme? How do we design and afford decent seperate cycle lanes in an urban landscape that is almost universally unsuitable for it? I'll be planning my touring routes avoiding busy roads in cities with even more vigour in the future. I would like to see Chris Boadmans proposed 'how cycling could be' programme. Let's hope the Beeb or someone takes him up on it.

Al
Reuse, recycle, thus do your bit to save the planet.... Get stuff at auctions, Dump, Charity Shops, Facebook Marketplace, Ebay, Car Boots. Choose an Old House, and a Banger ..... And cycle as often as you can......
reohn2
Posts: 45180
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by reohn2 »

Simon L6 wrote:One of the standout edits was on Ben's video. They showed the near head-on with a motorcyclist. They didn't show the motorcyclist offering a heartfelt apology.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekSMrAL-N9E bad language alert!


The word cut and shut(down) spring to mind and also show what a travesty this appalling "documentary" is :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
kwackers
Posts: 15643
Joined: 4 Jun 2008, 9:29pm
Location: Warrington

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by kwackers »

mrjemm wrote:How can observers know if someone is smug or arrogant from a glance as a bike passes/is passed, or at best paused at some lights... Ah no, cycles never stop at those. :wink:

They don't.
Cyclists make them feel inferior. We're fit and healthy, not paying through the nose for fuel, 'road tax' etc. We're not destroying air quality, or wrecking towns and cities.
What they feel is their guilt, they know we're not feeling it and they presume that makes us smug.
It's just relativism in action.
reohn2
Posts: 45180
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by reohn2 »

kwackers wrote:......Cyclists make them feel inferior. We're fit and healthy, not paying through the nose for fuel, 'road tax' etc. We're not destroying air quality, or wrecking towns and cities.
What they feel is their guilt, they know we're not feeling it and they presume that makes us smug.
It's just relativism in action.


I've often wondered about this and think of the human condition,specifically it's egocentricity. Especially when it's let to rule in the individual,so as that same train of thought can be applied to to all humans,it's not just motorists who fall under it's spell.
There is an element of smugness in some cyclists,we only have to examine the "their not a proper/real cyclist" accusation some level at others to elevate themselves to position of bona fide real cyclists.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
ukdodger
Posts: 2992
Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 5:32pm
Location: Sunny Surrey

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by ukdodger »

kwackers wrote:
mrjemm wrote:How can observers know if someone is smug or arrogant from a glance as a bike passes/is passed, or at best paused at some lights... Ah no, cycles never stop at those. :wink:

They don't.
Cyclists make them feel inferior. We're fit and healthy, not paying through the nose for fuel, 'road tax' etc. We're not destroying air quality, or wrecking towns and cities.
What they feel is their guilt, they know we're not feeling it and they presume that makes us smug.
It's just relativism in action.


It's simpler than that. Cyclists make them feel that we're privileged.
kwackers
Posts: 15643
Joined: 4 Jun 2008, 9:29pm
Location: Warrington

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by kwackers »

reohn2 wrote:
kwackers wrote:......Cyclists make them feel inferior. We're fit and healthy, not paying through the nose for fuel, 'road tax' etc. We're not destroying air quality, or wrecking towns and cities.
What they feel is their guilt, they know we're not feeling it and they presume that makes us smug.
It's just relativism in action.


I've often wondered about this and think of the human condition,specifically it's egocentricity. Especially when it's let to rule in the individual,so as that same train of thought can be applied to to all humans,it's not just motorists who are under it's spell.

There's a whole psychology based around it.

We're one of the wealthiest nations on earth and yet many of us feel poor and hard done by. In lots of countries that are genuinely poor and hard done by there are lots of folk who don't.
As social creatures we internally compare ourselves to others and from that construct our worth.
Once you know what your worth is then you can target those who you perceive to have higher worth. As a rule the politics of envy mean you'll generally hate those you perceive to have more value. It's not often anyone hates folk they feel superior to...
reohn2
Posts: 45180
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by reohn2 »

ukdodger wrote:It's simpler than that. Cyclists make them feel that we're privileged.


I'd say it's even simpler than that,some people like to feel superior none more so than those in a position of power.
Which is bad enough when that power is limited ie;subject to laws,enforced by others with greater power than themselves(police?)
But when those laws aren't enforced,their absolute power corrupts absolutely,that kind of corruption is very dangerous in the hands of anyone but in this instance a tonne or more of steel with with a very powerful means of propulsion .

Edi:- this bit added
Last edited by reohn2 on 6 Dec 2012, 5:09pm, edited 1 time in total.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
reohn2
Posts: 45180
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by reohn2 »

kwackers wrote:......... As a rule the politics of envy mean you'll generally hate those you perceive to have more value. It's not often anyone hates folk they feel superior to...


Wish I could believe that,as to take it to it's logical conclusion motorists would feel they needed to help cyclists along a bit by atleast feeling sorry for their perceived inferiority.I've never yet met a motorist who feels inferior to cyclists ie;the guy the big stick will always feel superior to the guy with little one.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
AlaninWales
Posts: 1626
Joined: 26 Oct 2012, 1:47pm

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by AlaninWales »

The program certainly has reached people other than cyclists... I'm now defending Magnatom's riding over in the IAM forum :shock: :lol: (members only I'm afraid - it's not always lonely in there, but if any IAM members are here, I could use some help as my fingers are getting tired).
ukdodger
Posts: 2992
Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 5:32pm
Location: Sunny Surrey

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by ukdodger »

reohn2 wrote:
kwackers wrote:......... As a rule the politics of envy mean you'll generally hate those you perceive to have more value. It's not often anyone hates folk they feel superior to...


Wish I could believe that,as to take it to it's logical conclusion motorists would feel they needed to help cyclists along a bit by atleast feeling sorry for their perceived inferiority.I've never yet met a motorist who feels inferior to cyclists ie;the guy the big stick will always feel superior to the guy with little one.


Ah yes the road pecking order. Lorries abuse vans, cars and motorcyclists, vans abuse cars and motorcyclists, cars abuse motorcyclists, they all abuse us.
kwackers
Posts: 15643
Joined: 4 Jun 2008, 9:29pm
Location: Warrington

Re: The War on Britain's Roads

Post by kwackers »

mrjemm wrote:Hmmm, present government excluded then?

The government don't hate us.

We're a commodity, and getting cheaper by the minute! :lol:
Post Reply