Graham wrote:The only anecdotal gossip is that the engineers were trying to agree whether the Ramp down into QECP should be an uninterrupted curve or have zigzags. !! Zigzags !! OMG madness . . .
I would have a different view though. An uninterrupted curve will, by its nature, result in speeds that I would consider inappropriate for that particular area. A short distance zig-zag I would think would be more appropriate.
Graham wrote:Yesterday, I found a section that I had never know existed before - alongside the A3 (west side) between West Liss & Ham Barn roundabout. http://binged.it/1WhEjdC
But don't get too excited : it was rubbish. An old tarmac footpath designated as a cyclepath. Very poor surface quality and I won't bother using it again despite providing a means to avoid crossing the A3 using the Ham Barn roundabout itself.
Anything that provides an alternative to riding on a major, high speed dual carriageway is a bonus IMO.
Surface quality is bad on a majority of roads these days due to false economy "top dressing" that is now breaking up into a horrid surface to drive/ride on. Cars aren't really affected too much by poor surface (potholes excepted); you notice them, but they don't really affect speed/handling as they do for cyclists.
My approach is to use cycle tyres and speeds that can handle such surfaces (and I ride a Brompton as well as a "normal") and be thankful for the routes that allow me to cycle on my own little road regardless of surface.
Until something drastic happens in this country, it isn't going to improve. Why are French roads so much better??????