Vorpal wrote:They looked at specific injury accidents. In other words, that a a crash had already occurred was a given, so crash rates and risk taking could not otherwise be considered.
But that's the point, they keep producing research that purports to show the benefit of helmets when they're systematically biasing it by presuming that the impact has already taken place.
al_yrpal wrote:Its just common sense, finite element analysis isnt needed for that.
It was common sense that told us the earth is flat and the sun orbits around it.