What constitutes a beautiful bike?
Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
My bike is beautiful - end of
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
reohn2 wrote:barrym wrote:reohn2 wrote:...neat Tig welds
Dunno, never seen one
Look closer :-
I know, I'm only stirring! Those are tidy, certainly, but I still think bicycles look better with lugs. However, to get some of the other, possibly, desirable features such as wide tyres, disks, you have to go with modern frames.
Actually there are any number of sloping TT bikes, especially Genesis, that have appeal. If your pic is the bike I'm thinking of, that's one!
--
Cheers
Barry
Cheers
Barry
Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Nothing more needs to be added really.
Nothing more needs to be added really.
Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
Picture of bike in question.
As I said, my pictured Longstaff is not a conventional bike, that was one of the questions that I was trying to get to though, does it have to be conventional to be beautiful? I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder. All the ugly comments that I have got have been on the Longstaff, the Moulton or the Recumbent. The Bob Jackson tourer, black with double box lining, and the Planet X, both get the comments beautiful.
As I said, my pictured Longstaff is not a conventional bike, that was one of the questions that I was trying to get to though, does it have to be conventional to be beautiful? I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder. All the ugly comments that I have got have been on the Longstaff, the Moulton or the Recumbent. The Bob Jackson tourer, black with double box lining, and the Planet X, both get the comments beautiful.
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
barrym wrote:I know, I'm only
I know I just stirring it in the opposite direction
but I still think bicycles look better with lugs.
Yuk!
However, to get some of the other, possibly, desirable features such as wide tyres, disks, you have to go with modern frames.
Now yer talking
Actually there are any number of sloping TT bikes, especially Genesis, that have appeal. If your pic is the bike I'm thinking of, that's one!
Beautiful!
And with a nice unicrown fork too!
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
tinyworld wrote:Picture of bike in question.
exp-03.gif
As I said, my pictured Longstaff is not a conventional bike, that was one of the questions that I was trying to get to though, does it have to be conventional to be beautiful? I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder. All the ugly comments that I have got have been on the Longstaff, the Moulton or the Recumbent. The Bob Jackson tourer, black with double box lining, and the Planet X, both get the comments beautiful.
I like the Longstaff,but it has to be said he made some plug ugly tandems
People can't think outside what between their lugs
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
reohn2 wrote:Beautiful!
And with a nice unicrown fork too!
I have to agree even though I can't see any 531 stickers anywhere
--
Cheers
Barry
Cheers
Barry
Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
reohn2 wrote:People can't think outside what between their lugs
Guilty as charged! Although, Moultons as mentioned above are beautiful. Practical? Dunno, but beautiful nevertheless.
NB, the above isn't an excuse for thread drift, OK?
--
Cheers
Barry
Cheers
Barry
Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
Re - Longstaff
I'm sorry, but there's not enough booze in the world....
That is one fugly bike - Sorry
the Genesis is very nice - although those mudguards just don't match that type of bike. I am not a lover of that elastomer monstrosity of a saddle either.
I'm sorry, but there's not enough booze in the world....
That is one fugly bike - Sorry
the Genesis is very nice - although those mudguards just don't match that type of bike. I am not a lover of that elastomer monstrosity of a saddle either.
Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
Threevok wrote:Re - Longstaff
I'm sorry, but there's not enough booze in the world....
That is one fugly bike - Sorry
You forgot to write "IMO"
the Genesis is very nice - although those mudguards just don't match that type of bike. I am not a lover of that elastomer monstrosity of a saddle either.
You mix up form with function.
Life is a compromise otherwise everything would be just so,mudgaurds keep me dry,warm and clean,the suspost saves my old body from being beat up too much.
Now what of the norm of full suspension MTB bikes?
BTW I've even had someone on here complain of that bike having "clown" tyres fitted
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
barrym wrote:I have to agree even though I can't see any 531 stickers anywhere
I haven't chased numbers for a loonnngggg time
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
The Thorn Cyclosportif from about 10 years ago floats my boat. A compact frame but beautifully fillet-brazed and with a stainless steel head tube badge! Class.
I loved mine but it was always a tad too small.
A bit mucky after a little ride in France
I loved mine but it was always a tad too small.
A bit mucky after a little ride in France
Cycling UK Life Member
PBP Ancien (2007)
PBP Ancien (2007)
Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
colour scheme is important - my Dawes 1-Down came with burnt orange frame and silver mudguards - looks far better with black ones
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
reohn2 wrote:barrym wrote:I know, I'm only
I know I just stirring it in the opposite directionbut I still think bicycles look better with lugs.
Yuk!However, to get some of the other, possibly, desirable features such as wide tyres, disks, you have to go with modern frames.
Now yer talkingActually there are any number of sloping TT bikes, especially Genesis, that have appeal. If your pic is the bike I'm thinking of, that's one!
Beautiful!
And with a nice unicrown fork too!
thats an interesting seat pin?
Re: What constitutes a beautiful bike?
tinyworld wrote:What constitutes a beautiful bike? I ask this question, as recently I was sat at the café, and unseen by the two young lads, looking at my bike. I heard the words, Eugh that’s an ugly looking bike. Now I have to say that it’s not conventional looking bike by any means. So what is it that makes a bike beautiful? ................
Firstly to accept that it's someone else's bike and it's presumably as they want it - and it's none of the critics' business...........and secondly the maturity to understand that.
Ride on tinyworld - ride on.