reohn2 wrote:landsurfer wrote:.......I possibly take the skills route as i am artistically incompetent. I can design but not create.....
By who's criteria?
Mine ......
reohn2 wrote:landsurfer wrote:.......I possibly take the skills route as i am artistically incompetent. I can design but not create.....
By who's criteria?
landsurfer wrote: Mine ......
Si wrote:All sport is judged on a subjective level to some extent.
For instance, watch rugby union where the ref is fromthe opposite hemisphere and the commentators will soon start talking about one team benefitting from reading the ref's interpretation of the rules better than the other.
Or after any big football match that was decided by a ref's decision the arguments will go on fo ages.
Even with a trials comp it is down to the course creator's subjective view of what makes a good course - this may well end up favouring one competitor over another.
Just that some sports are a bit more honest about their subjectivity.....which in some ways can make them more objective.
The problem with artistic wotnotting is that many observers, especially outsiders, don't understand the marking system thus it can appear somewhat random.
peetee wrote:Does this count?adri van de pol.jpg
Bmblbzzz wrote:It's pretty impressive. I think it might be better called Gymnastic Cycling rather than Artistic Cycling. Or perhaps even Cycling Gymnastics as it seems to have more in common with gymnastics than cycling.
The skill, balance, coordination and strength of the people doing it is brilliant.
No that's an artist's impression of cycling
peetee wrote:No that's an artist's impression of cycling
It's a cyclist and artist who understands the suffering etched across Mr Van Der Pol's face.
peetee wrote:Maybe. I can't speak for all artists but I suppose if they can do their job right then it's all down to the beholder.