HaroldBriercliffe wrote:Public sector job ads keep the Graun ticking over.
Awful paper otherwise.
There are hardly any job ads now, twenty years ago society and education had hundreds (Wednesdays + Tuesdays)
HaroldBriercliffe wrote:Public sector job ads keep the Graun ticking over.
Awful paper otherwise.
What could I read instead?
meic wrote:What could I read instead?
RT News. If our government think it worth spending £10 million to stop you hearing what they have to say, then there must be something worth seeing there. The American government hates it even more.
It reminds me of how we used to consider that the Russians' criminalisation of the possession of some of our publications was one of the key determiners of who were the good guys and who were the bad guys.
We used to be The Land of the Free where free speech was an unalienable right.
Not that you should believe RT news any more than you should believe the Guardian, treat them all with suspicion.
I know what happened there.
Cyril Haearn wrote:We really really can not know what happened in a far away place where most of us have never been, years later maybe no-one can know
Painstaking analysis has shown that to be the case.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysi ... _Flight_17
I read a good deal about the incident after it happened.
It horrified me.
I saw footage of those armed men preventing access to the crash site.
And I came to the conclusion that It was shot down by a missle.
All by my little unimaginive self!!
That is not the case.
They prevented access by international air accident investigators for a week.
And were obstructive far longer.
And they prevented by means of arms access by the International Peace Keeping corp led by a neutral Swiss who also wanted to secure the site.
But it is right that the truth come out though and blame be laid at the guilty party's door.
Why would anyone not wish that to be the case ??