Brucey wrote:NB IIRC Surly disc trucker is available to accept 559 wheels in up to medium sizes.
Correct, up to size 58. https://surlybikes.com/bikes/disc_trucker/geometry
Brucey wrote:NB IIRC Surly disc trucker is available to accept 559 wheels in up to medium sizes.
bretonbikes wrote:Personally I'd think hard about going to 26" wheels as it makes lower gearing easier. With modern slick tyres they fly along...
CJ wrote:...[ 26" wheels] ....Think very hard and then think again.....
meic wrote:For example I've toured in places where you really need just two gears, mainly, because you are riding on the flat or you are climbing, and the roads are engineered so that the climbs pretty much all have the same gradient. If these correspond with nice efficient gears then the rest of it doesn't really matter... :wink
Have they abolished wind too?
meic wrote:For example I've toured in places where you really need just two gears, mainly, because you are riding on the flat or you are climbing, and the roads are engineered so that the climbs pretty much all have the same gradient. If these correspond with nice efficient gears then the rest of it doesn't really matter... :wink
Have they abolished wind too?
meic wrote:For example I've toured in places where you really need just two gears, mainly, because you are riding on the flat or you are climbing, and the roads are engineered so that the climbs pretty much all have the same gradient. If these correspond with nice efficient gears then the rest of it doesn't really matter... :wink
Have they abolished wind too?
meic wrote:For example I've toured in places where you really need just two gears, mainly, because you are riding on the flat or you are climbing, and the roads are engineered so that the climbs pretty much all have the same gradient. If these correspond with nice efficient gears then the rest of it doesn't really matter... :wink
Have they abolished wind too?
meic wrote:For example I've toured in places where you really need just two gears, mainly, because you are riding on the flat or you are climbing, and the roads are engineered so that the climbs pretty much all have the same gradient. If these correspond with nice efficient gears then the rest of it doesn't really matter... :wink
Have they abolished wind too?
SA_SA_SA wrote:CJ wrote:...[ 26" wheels] ....Think very hard and then think again.....
If one likes 26 by 1.75in wheels can one avoid the thinking?
(26 by 1.75 makes Marathon Pluses OK at the rear and I like the cushioning of a normal 26in by 1.75in on the front: cos my cheap Mtn bike frame with drops has very rigid forks).
If quality 26x1.75 tyres remained available I could live with that.
Sweep wrote:Just recently bought such a marathon plus for the rear of my ridgeback expedition. Hope CJ is being overly gloomy on future tyre availability and quality. Am happy to use 1.75 tyres on that bike.CJ wrote:...[ 26" wheels] ....Think very hard and then think again.....
Brucey wrote:who knows what will happen in the future, but for now reports of the 559 size's death in road tyres may be 'greatly exaggerated'; there are millions of 26" wheeled bikes being ridden around and a straw poll from a retailer (wiggle)
http://www.wiggle.co.uk/mtb-slick-tyres/26-559-wheel-size/
shows a choice of about twenty tyres (plus width variants) that might be suitable for touring on, from 1.25" upwards including gatorskins, marathons, marathon plus, marathon supreme and RibMos. For some reason the list does not contain any vittorias and there are other notable omissions too, so there are many more than that available. If you are really worried about a distress purchase/emergency tyre not being up to it, you can always carry a folding spare.
My guess is that in many parts of the world you will still be better off running 559 tyres than (say) 584 tyres in five to ten year's time.
cheers