Deterring mobile phone use

Bonefishblues
Posts: 8455
Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
Location: Near Bicester Oxon

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby Bonefishblues » 16 Jul 2018, 5:24pm

meic wrote:
I am taking about a vehicle travelling at a speed such that it becomes a hazard in that context equally as much as driving in excess of the prevailing limit. It was advice I was given as a learner driver, and is still the advice now, seemingly https://www.theorytestadvice.co.uk/driv ... ogress.htm

There is a difference between how you are expected to drive in order to prove competency and how you are expected to drive every day.
On a test you are obliged to make progress in order to prove that you are capable of doing so.
Once you have passed your test you are perfectly free to drive at a speed which is efficient for your vehicle. There is a significant fuel advantage doing 60mph compared to 70mph.

Look at this advice from the Department of Transport.
http://www.dft.gov.uk/vca/fcb/smarter-driving-tips.asp

And indeed such a speed differential wouldn't attract any attention would it - at least not from me. I attach significance to the words "where appropriate" in that linky.

If however, as an example, a car was driving more slowly than 56mph limited vehicles on a motorway, then one might want to look at that scenario, perhaps?

User avatar
meic
Posts: 19355
Joined: 1 Feb 2007, 9:37pm
Location: Caerfyrddin (Carmarthen)

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby meic » 16 Jul 2018, 5:56pm

50mph is recommended as even more fuel efficient.

What is really needed, remembering that we have signed the Paris agreement is a reducing of the maximum speed limit, not the introduction of a environmentally unfriendly minimum one.
Yma o Hyd

User avatar
mjr
Posts: 16368
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby mjr » 16 Jul 2018, 6:13pm

Bonefishblues wrote: I am taking about a vehicle travelling at a speed such that it becomes a hazard in that context equally as much as driving in excess of the prevailing limit. It was advice I was given as a learner driver, and is still the advice now, seemingly https://www.theorytestadvice.co.uk/driv ... ogress.htm

That ain't a law. There is no general law requiring people to drive at the limit, at least not until you're going so slowly as to be the sort of rolling obstruction that thirdcrank alluded to. It is extremely unhelpful to suggest that there is, apparently in an attempt to scaremonger people into driving faster than is good.

I remain of the opinion that the part of the driving standard on making progress is often misinterpreted, outdated and harmful to public safety. It should be revised at the earliest opportunity - and I'm not just saying that because I failed one test for that (primarily because I slowed down for a school zone at about 10am) and passed the one where I broke the speed limit.

That does hint at another thing: I can drive around breaking speed limits so I can pass the driving test, but I do not usually drive that aggressively. I'm sure others can drive without using their phones so they can pass the driving test, but that's not how they usually drive.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.

Bonefishblues
Posts: 8455
Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
Location: Near Bicester Oxon

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby Bonefishblues » 16 Jul 2018, 6:26pm

mjr wrote:
Bonefishblues wrote: I am taking about a vehicle travelling at a speed such that it becomes a hazard in that context equally as much as driving in excess of the prevailing limit. It was advice I was given as a learner driver, and is still the advice now, seemingly https://www.theorytestadvice.co.uk/driv ... ogress.htm

That ain't a law. There is no general law requiring people to drive at the limit, at least not until you're going so slowly as to be the sort of rolling obstruction that thirdcrank alluded to. It is extremely unhelpful to suggest that there is, apparently in an attempt to scaremonger people into driving faster than is good.

I remain of the opinion that the part of the driving standard on making progress is often misinterpreted, outdated and harmful to public safety. It should be revised at the earliest opportunity - and I'm not just saying that because I failed one test for that (primarily because I slowed down for a school zone at about 10am) and passed the one where I broke the speed limit.

That does hint at another thing: I can drive around breaking speed limits so I can pass the driving test, but I do not usually drive that aggressively. I'm sure others can drive without using their phones so they can pass the driving test, but that's not how they usually drive.

This is to misrepresent the point I was making to make a point of your own choosing. But you know that, too.

Bmblbzzz
Posts: 3638
Joined: 18 May 2012, 7:56pm
Location: From here to there.

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby Bmblbzzz » 16 Jul 2018, 6:34pm

I'm not sure whether "carriageway" includes the central reservation; I expect it does not. I've seen (driven past) workers in the central reservation who had neither a line of cones nor a speed limit to protect them. But they did have hi-viz, so obviously that's ok! They were picking litter I think, so I suspect they might have been doing some sort of community service sentence. And it was 20 years ago so rules/procedures might have changed now.

User avatar
mjr
Posts: 16368
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby mjr » 16 Jul 2018, 6:46pm

Bonefishblues wrote:This is to misrepresent the point I was making to make a point of your own choosing. But you know that, too.

The entire post was:
Bonefishblues wrote:Then do consider, under UK law (no idea about Germany) whether you are making sufficient progress. But we're already in Groundhog territory now.

What point do you think you were making, if it wasn't that UK law requires people to aim to drive at or near the limit at some times? (which it doesn't)
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.

Cyril Haearn
Posts: 14553
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am
Location: Leafy suburbia

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby Cyril Haearn » 16 Jul 2018, 6:48pm

What is groundhog territory please?
Entertainer, idealist, intellectual, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies

Bonefishblues
Posts: 8455
Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
Location: Near Bicester Oxon

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby Bonefishblues » 16 Jul 2018, 6:54pm

mjr wrote:
Bonefishblues wrote:This is to misrepresent the point I was making to make a point of your own choosing. But you know that, too.

The entire post was:
Bonefishblues wrote:Then do consider, under UK law (no idea about Germany) whether you are making sufficient progress. But we're already in Groundhog territory now.

What point do you think you were making, if it wasn't that UK law requires people to aim to drive at or near the limit at some times? (which it doesn't)

Not that one, thanks. 3C understood the point being made, clearly.

Bonefishblues
Posts: 8455
Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
Location: Near Bicester Oxon

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby Bonefishblues » 16 Jul 2018, 6:56pm

Cyril Haearn wrote:What is groundhog territory please?

As in, we were getting into territory we'd discussed before :D

User avatar
mjr
Posts: 16368
Joined: 20 Jun 2011, 7:06pm
Location: Norfolk or Somerset, mostly
Contact:

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby mjr » 16 Jul 2018, 9:52pm

Bonefishblues wrote:
mjr wrote:What point do you think you were making, if it wasn't that UK law requires people to aim to drive at or near the limit at some times? (which it doesn't)

Not that one, thanks. 3C understood the point being made, clearly.

By citing a different law applying to middle lane hogging which wasn't at all what Cyril Haearn said they were doing? Madder and madder.
MJR, mostly pedalling 3-speed roadsters. KL+West Norfolk BUG incl social easy rides http://www.klwnbug.co.uk
All the above is CC-By-SA and no other implied copyright license to Cycle magazine.

Bonefishblues
Posts: 8455
Joined: 7 Jul 2014, 9:45pm
Location: Near Bicester Oxon

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby Bonefishblues » 16 Jul 2018, 9:55pm

mjr wrote:
Bonefishblues wrote:
mjr wrote:What point do you think you were making, if it wasn't that UK law requires people to aim to drive at or near the limit at some times? (which it doesn't)

Not that one, thanks. 3C understood the point being made, clearly.

By citing a different law applying to middle lane hogging which wasn't at all what Cyril Haearn said they were doing? Madder and madder.

Indeed

Cyril Haearn
Posts: 14553
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am
Location: Leafy suburbia

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby Cyril Haearn » 16 Jul 2018, 10:15pm

I am not a member of CLODS centre lane owner drivers society :wink:
Entertainer, idealist, intellectual, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies

User avatar
meic
Posts: 19355
Joined: 1 Feb 2007, 9:37pm
Location: Caerfyrddin (Carmarthen)

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby meic » 16 Jul 2018, 10:21pm

Are you sure?
Leaving more than a cars length safety space before returning to the inner lane, has you in that society from a lot of drivers' point of view.
Yma o Hyd

Bmblbzzz
Posts: 3638
Joined: 18 May 2012, 7:56pm
Location: From here to there.

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby Bmblbzzz » 17 Jul 2018, 5:23pm

Presumably this device can detect all sorts of signals from mobile phones. Or will it only detect phone calls? The point is that actual calls are a minority of the danger and distraction caused by mobile phone use while driving -- as you'd expect, given they're a minority of mobile phone use overall. Example today: Car in front of me stopped at red light. Due to road layout there is no point filtering here, so it was just the one car with me behind. Light goes red and yellow, no reaction (not "didn't move off", no reaction from driver, who I could see clearly through rear window; light goes green, no reaction; wait a second, no reaction. Ping my bell, driver looks up, sees green light, engages gear and moves off (bells are useful!). Fifty metres the car stops in traffic and here there is a kerbside cycle lane. As I pass the car I see clearly the driver has a large phone fixed to the windscreen in a holder, with messages displayed that she is reading and replying to. As this demonstrates, a phone doesn't have to be transmitting or receiving to be distracting - just as reading and writing a letter while driving would be dangerously distracting. In fact in this case it didn't even need to be on, as it was fixed in a place where it must have been obstructing the driver's view through the windscreen.

Jdsk
Posts: 3831
Joined: 5 Mar 2019, 5:42pm

Re: Deterring mobile phone use

Postby Jdsk » 17 Oct 2020, 1:55pm

NB date.

Guardian coverage of revised definition of illegal use:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/oct/17/uk-bans-any-use-of-mobile-phones-while-driving

Jonathan