gaz wrote:[
The Council also have a legal duty to provide access for disabled people, many of whom use cycles.
Really, the cycling disabled are somewhat thin on the ground here in Yorkshire, especially in towns.
gaz wrote:[
The Council also have a legal duty to provide access for disabled people, many of whom use cycles.
landsurfer wrote:gaz wrote:[
The Council also have a legal duty to provide access for disabled people, many of whom use cycles.
Really, the cycling disabled are somewhat thin on the ground here in Yorkshire, especially in towns.
landsurfer wrote:gaz wrote:[
The Council also have a legal duty to provide access for disabled people, many of whom use cycles.
Really, the cycling disabled are somewhat thin on the ground here in Yorkshire, especially in towns.
landsurfer wrote:gaz wrote:[
The Council also have a legal duty to provide access for disabled people, many of whom use cycles.
Really, the cycling disabled are somewhat thin on the ground here in Yorkshire, especially in towns.
djrikki wrote:..
Ps. cycling up one-way streets - different subject but the majority of no-entry signs need to be revisited and have 'except cycles' written underneath on square signs with rounded edges and made of metal
landsurfer wrote:Sorry that was out of context ... my response was to the amount of disabled people that cycle ...
Riding a bicycle requires a great deal of ability, being disabled may reduce the numbers of cyclists within the disabled group as opposed to the abled / ability group in society.
As the husband of a disabled wife i genuinely understand the restrictions and opportunities a disability can provide.
Cyril Haearn wrote:landsurfer wrote:Sorry that was out of context ... my response was to the amount of disabled people that cycle ...
Riding a bicycle requires a great deal of ability, being disabled may reduce the numbers of cyclists within the disabled group as opposed to the abled / ability group in society.
As the husband of a disabled wife i genuinely understand the restrictions and opportunities a disability can provide.
Opportunities? Please explain
reohn2 wrote:I think it's safe to say the country is anti cycling
pete75 wrote:No, no cycling that's a good one but it's effectively what the sign means. Doesn't the white cycle on a blue background below also mean cycling allowed. Contradictory signage - how is anyone to know which is correct?
landsurfer wrote:This country is anti-cycling, .... motoring, walking, swimming, pizza, motorbikes, hats, .... pick your own relevant "Anti" ....
In reality we are probably one of the most tolerant societies on the planet ... we even release terrorists to walk among us.... !
We are "Anti " nothing in this country ... lets stop trying to find a reason to be victims .....
landsurfer wrote:gaz wrote:[
The Council also have a legal duty to provide access for disabled people, many of whom use cycles.
Really, the cycling disabled are somewhat thin on the ground here in Yorkshire, especially in towns.